245 karma · joined March 8, 2021
I once got in trouble with BP because they didn't believe me that I was coming in to work on a project and thought I would be looking for a job to stay illegally. BP finally decided to let me in and told me that what I was doing was fine, but they just didn't find it credible that I would leave my GF alone for a month in Argentina.
I've done this 10+ times in my career, for big and small companies, and it was never an issue even when explicitly saying these things with border patrol/immigration.
What gets you in trouble at the border is the risk of permanently staying, and the risk of drugs&money.
And of course, companies also have practical right to make mistakes, from overstaffing to understaffing, or to place bets that do well or do not.
The point is that these things would happen even if things were being run perfectly, so they are not indicative of nefarious practices or abuses.
There is no sociopathy, it is a simple enterprise where someone absorbs the risk and others don't - it is collaboration.
It's better this way - otherwise employees at companies that make no money would have to take no salary.
Yes, runs can kill any bank, but insolvency killed SVB first.
That's what bitcoin was all about..
I read this as "Rently Ticks". Not a great name!
Please think about the payoff matrix and the fiduciary responsibility of the actors.
And Robinhood still keeps saying this as a tagline!