There's just no such thing as an amazing person. All people are of equal worth. It's a terrible concept.
23 karma · joined November 30, 2020
No one, even on a powerful committee, has any real power to legislate at the moment, and so the anger is really just that: the basis for a WSJ headline.
Obtuse af. Is this default assumption that the user is the one who has to "create" associations in the company's systems based on anything? The big tech cos have been social mapping since before 2012 and they undoubtedly register when two accounts use the same IP.
He's just not ever going to be as cool as Bill Gates. Like really, we get it. You're ambitious. You're pushing the boundaries of human technology. That's enough. We would like you for that alone.
When he opens up more than that, it's just reading lists like this and twitter spats with fucking small town mayors, and unfortunate stories about his dad or about his ex-wives and he's really just cringy as a mfer once we get past all the science, but seriously the science is great.
Mystique my man. You don't need to talk to us plebs. Stop.
>"The intro paragraph is basically an ad because the free articles drive subscriptions for the paid ones"
He uses ", though," four separate times in a single post. Is that by design, because it's a free article?