147 karma · joined November 7, 2011
Eric Schmidt almost surely doesn't _need_ ex special forces guys doing his security. He does it because it makes him feel/look important, or he's paranoid, or he may as well because he has the money and the company may pay for it anyway.
There are plenty of super-rich super-famous people in SV who don't have large security entourages and get by just fine.
Also, the company may not allow you to early exercise. Ask them before accepting an offer!
This is of course a ridiculous argument when the parameters of the discussion haven't even been established.
For example, we could get rid of all our social services and use the outlays and administrative costs on a basic income (minus the administrative costs of the basic income itself). That might not be a good idea for various reasons, but there's no law of mathematics preventing it.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/01/20/three-piece-suit...
I think the above poster had it correct; refer to it as "crony capitalism" to non-economists.
When he sticks to economics (his blog has a higher percentage of economic material compared to his column) he is definitely worth reading and shouldn't be dismissed with ad hominem attacks.