the_narrator

Based on the Google engineer's LinkedIn profile, it is obvious that using any gendered pronoun will be a touchy subject.

I agree, this is true. In this particular case though, there has been sensationalism for decades now - it tends to have the opposite of the intended effect.

That is the problem. Without actual proof of something, sensational headlines are mandatory.

I am not sure what you are thinking of, but it isn't 1Password.

I use 1Password 7 and only use a local vault (synced across devices with Resilio Sync). There is no reason you have to pay for a subscription if you don't want to.

> I'm always wary of bank account details stored by a startup

Venmo is owned by PayPal

I have seen right-wing brought up multiple times, how does the same not apply to the far left?

I have been running wireguard through an AWS instance, so far at least I have had zero issues like you describe.

Why is that surprising? If you kill somebody, you will obviously have some of your rights taken away.

> The main risk with We is that there's a recession, occupancy drops to 50%, and they're stuck with the leases. But that's not a unique risk.

What is unique is how massively overexposed they are to this risk.

Fastmail is no longer owned by Opera, it was spun off in 2013.

This was common and well known even in the mid 90's with the TI-82. So much so that when my high school calculus class mostly bombed a test, the instructor asked us how we could have possibly failed his test when we were all using "notes" on our calculator.

So if IBM didn't suffer or (publicly) disclose huge losses, it doesn't matter that someone scammed them into hiring unqualified engineers?

you seem to be contradicting yourself

> a yield inversion may or may not lead to a recession

> all inversions eventually lead to a recession

I think what really matters is that your test coverage percentage increases over time and never goes down. A goal of 100% might be ideal, but is rarely realistic.

that seems logical; I fail to understand the argument that some form of voter identification like this is 'racist'

Which would mean they do _not_ make a profit on each ride.

Basically, these all say the same thing and aren't _that_ scary aside from the fact they are from the IRS: Amend your prior returns if you owe money. I am curious if they expect the same if you lost money.

That tends to happen when you make up facts.

The assumptions you make are amusing, and some might even say racist.

1. It doesn't sound realistic 2. It is an article trying to push the narrative that everything is racist 3. CNN

> That’s some terrible customer service.

If true, yes.

This repo violates GitHub TOS, specifically it "contains or installs any active malware or exploits"

https://github.com/contact/report-abuse?report=baileywj+%28u...

Maybe you should send the site a list of domains you allow so they can tailor their articles for you?

Complaining multiple times about being downvoted tends to add to more downvotes.

This post has hit number one on the front page, so I assume I am out of the loop; why is this significant?

How is that not just a factual statement? Some may not like reality, but it is what it is.

I can't imagine using Google services if one is remotely privacy conscious. Just from your own defense:

Drive: > your data isn't scanned (except for...

Google DNS: > What logging exists is extremely temporary...

Gmail: > we receive your email, scan it for ....

Layoffs happen; these kind of whiny twitter rants aren't really helpful for anyone.

> I can't in good faith ever do that to a high-performing employee I'm making redundant.

How virtuous of you. What about a mediocre performing one?