What it's like to be a white woman named LaKiesha
cnn.com
cnn.com
> "Yasmina, party of six," she said.
> "I need something easier to pronounce," he said.
> She repeated her name but he didn't want to try to pronounce it. And then she was no longer there.
> "He looks at a 12-year-old in our party and he says, 'What's your name?' '' says Bouraoui, a manager with the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. "Now he's just ignoring me."
That’s some terrible customer service. I’ve heard many people give aliases or single syllable westernized names by choice to simplify things, but having the employee you’re dealing with insist on it is particularly insulting.
If true, yes.
Or is this coming from a upper middle class white male that has always lived amongst people who look and sound like they do?
If anything, it's less likely for whites - most Western countries have above-average diversity.
So most people should probably not cast dispersions about the validity of the claims made by the marginalized.
Maybe I am missing something?
> That belief is partly why many Irish, Italian and Polish immigrants who came to America in the early 20th century whitened their children's names to avoid persecution and increase their chances of social mobility.
> Tim Machuga is a software engineer who also knows what it's like to be black for a minute. He is a white man with an African name.
A typical Eastern European last name to me.
I wonder what does my first name (Oleksii) sound like to folks in the US?
That's a big reason why there are so many similar spelled surnames. They'd write it down 'wrong' at Ellis Island, and that's what you were stuck with. Oleksii, Oleksy, etc.
I agree with you that Machuga doesn't sound black at all. Maybe Hispanic if you're pronouncing it 'Mah-choo-gah'
Interesting that this submission got flagged. I wonder why?
I feel like the reporter asked around the office for people who'd had these experiences, and Tim mentioned his, so he put him in the article.
Also, the first name bias is quite real. I dated a lady for most of my late teens - mid 20's named Ticia (pronounced Teecha, rather than Tisha). She's Ojibwe Chippewa, but this was rural TN and SC, so race is treated as a very binary black/white checkbox, and she falls into the "white" category. However, Ticia is a "black" name, for the most part. I lost count of the number of times I saw blatantly rude reactions when she introduced herself.
>White – A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
How about european immigrants that just arrived in the US within the last decade,should native minorities have better opportunities than them?
And what exactly is race? Ancestry? National origin? Consider this list: north african arab,turk,spanish, white skinned mexican,brown skinned egyptian,light skinned indian,albanian and south african with european ancestry. Lets say these people and their families immigrated to the US in the late 80's and had children immediately,their children will be treated very differently from each other. Which race are they? The south african is white but the mexican is not so white?
The law has no business defining race or using this social construct for systemic inequalities. This breeds so much strife,resentment and division and is not sustainable.
When you benefit one group, if you in the process benefit and harm other groups unfairly you're only shuffling around inequality. I believe the end result is even more unfairness and injustice to even more groups of people.
Nobody wants to make a call and change anything that is wrong...let alone questions of what happens to progress reports of someone was X and now Y....
It’s incoherent at times (that was the most egregious example) and seems to reflect the author’s bizarre misconceptions about the world (e.g. claiming “Jace” is a non traditional name).
You're missing the fact that the US was founded on the principle of racial hierarchy which led to centuries of oppression and stratification of class along racial lines. Numerous laws were passed in the US which explicitly granted or denied rights by race, the most obvious being slavery, through which people of African descent were legally classified as property in slaveholding states, and "separate but equal" laws post Reconstruction.
As a result of this history of racial discrimination, American culture and law are inextricably linked to racial segregation and classification, as must be any attempts to correct the injustices of the past.
[0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_aspects_of_race_in_th...
[1]https://www.census.gov/acs/www/about/why-we-ask-each-questio...
[2]https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/why-census-is-right-to-as...
It absolutely aligns with HN's goal of promoting intellectual curiosity. Furthermore the comments so far have been civil and uncontroversial.
With this in mind, could the person(s) who flagged it please unflag it?
He's not once mentioned any discrimination he has experienced because of his name.
I'm not saying there's no prejudice here but I think it is less extreme.
It's about a German guy whos hippie parents named Ranjid and now he has some of the problems usually only immigrants have.