568 karma · joined April 4, 2018
I’m not even sure why but this sentiment rubs me the wrong way.
Perhaps it’s that what’s resonated most to me about democracy is the premise that it is all “for the people, of the people, by the people.”
There’s something exclusive about that statement.
Personal preference are tautological.
It seems illogical to me to put the blame entirely on one administration.
Just wondering how they determined the length was enough? Was it constrained by a datatype or just an assumption on user behavior?
fun to imagine whether images help in this scenario
I think both conjectures are likely true.
I’ve wondered if there was any interaction between them but cannot find any evidence.
One thing that’s missing is the low-latency old analog systems had changing channels. Has anyone figured out a way to achieve this in the digital era?
What should we spend the next dollar on to achieve this goal?
I agree largely that the efforts have been successful but there’s more than one incident. I’ll even speculate wildly without any evidence that there have been more than two.
I’m skeptical an arrangement like this could work. The authentication mechanism would be interesting enough to attract security researchers and likely open anonymous Internet access that may undermine any potential benefit gained from viewer data. I could be wrong but I hope not.
This doesn’t quite refute your assertion of no leaks of searches but it is just as egregious. You are right about incentives too.
There’s a new development planned for the SRI site and I was hoping there’d be some honorary for that hallowed ground.
There’s still a free-throw left to earn the old fashioned way.
Mostly the thinking is this encourages post-play since bigs are usually worse free-throw shooters. Also, it should shorten game length which is another recent audience concern.