568 karma · joined April 4, 2018
stopped reading here as this is simply not true. at the very least agents sent headers.
It makes me wonder about the web a bit and whether it becomes glossier, more video driven but ultimately less directly maleable.
Do people prefer streaming text over static pages?
Reminds me of “this guy Diego…”
full disclosure, this user did not read the article.
Debatable and definitely semantic - at the very least this requires putting the audio into a buffer, so a newly mallocd block of memory. Sure, it’s not a recording in a conventional sense, but it is a copy of data.
We’re one decade into cookie banners and privacy regulations by jurisdiction. There’s some vague similarities with interference here.
apple’s secrecy agenda has been defeated to an extent by the practicalities of ubiquitous technology?
Shows could synchronize additional content that’d be visible when Shazam mode enabled.
It occurs to me that Shazam has such a better reputation online because the intent and consent of the user is honored.
It makes me wonder if there couldn’t be an implementation on TVs that is similar and actually is a net positive for consumers. Basically would customers actually like TV ACR if the data wasn’t just going to sell more ads?
Conan really handled that disaster with tremendous grace and it paid immediate dividends. I can’t really think of a similar situation in popular culture. It is a good reminder of how to handle oneself especially during turmoil.
Interesting read but that part really made me question my own sanity. It’s probably just lost in translation.
It’s sad. It never occurred to me we’d get here.
One can always suppose the identified individual is a double, triple, quadruple agent.
I do love thought experiments like this but do believe they’re insatiably unresolvable.
FWIW - it’s made of people
when will it replace the headline in editorial importance?
So, we’re losing.
If you don’t respond to this comment, I’ll assume you agree.