But misunderstood, see below…
25 karma · joined July 13, 2018
But misunderstood, see below…
[1] Bird vs. Frogs. https://www.ams.org/notices/200902/rtx090200212p.pdf
Of course, only as an addition to the current mix. For math problems, this will be easier than for other contexts.
I like text books for pop science or really hard things - like university level education. But I am surprised to see them as an option for basic education.
15% failure rate is optimal for learning
I have no data to back it up.
I think it is qualitatively different from programming, because you try to find a reasonable good fit for data you know to guess new future data. Classical programming relies on rules and decisions. ML is closer to numerics, statistics, simulations. Guess the function from the data vs define a function and programm it.
Non-drinkers might have reasons not to drink. Like taking medicaments, health issues, etc.