Clint Eastwood = Old West Action
Madam Curie = Radium came
It's good fun to go find anagrams of friends and family. One of my nephew's comes out Alpaca Tits. He's not real happy about it but the rest of us think it's pretty good.
2,781 karma · joined November 11, 2007
Clint Eastwood = Old West Action
Madam Curie = Radium came
It's good fun to go find anagrams of friends and family. One of my nephew's comes out Alpaca Tits. He's not real happy about it but the rest of us think it's pretty good.
The article is clearly trying to put Trump in a bad light and other comments here are applying it to other politicians and corporations. I think the important point is that repetition doesn't discriminate truth but can be dangerous because it can seem like it does. On important issues there is no substitute for research and accurate methods to interpret new data.
Commercials are incredibly intrusive. I am amazed at what I was willing to put up with for so long.
Sports commentary is offensively vapid. Actual comment from the Olympic coverage this last year: "This routine is so difficult it's been called incredibly difficult". Even allowing for getting a little tongue tied on live tv it was painfully bad.
Most other commentary is awful. Listening to explanations filtered through what a reporter is willing to take the time to understand just doesn't compare when are so many good sources from real experts in so many fields online.
Maybe I'm just to the point where I want to yell at kids to stay off my lawn but I don't see how the "TV ecosystem" survives much longer.
It looks nice, the last model looks nice too. The touch bar looks like it could be nice, 95% of my time I use an external keyboard. The new display looks really nice, 95% of my time I use two large external monitors. The USB-C ports will in the long run be more convenient, right now I'm looking at > $100 in adapters.
I'll check them out at the store but I may just look for a good price on the last model.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atacama_Desert#/media/File:Ata...
See:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20140305/ivory-ban-fact-shee... http://www.ptg.org/scripts/4disapi.dll/4DCGI/cms/review.html...
I thought that was pretty cool but after reading the article the actual way it was done was much more interesting.
From the article: "But while there’s a lower bound to how “under” the median a step can be – a step can’t take negative time – there’s virtually no upper limit to how much over the median time a project can take."
So when one step takes a little longer than expected most people fall into the 150 mph trap and get frustrated when they don't meet the false expectation.