301 karma · joined May 6, 2008
We give you the tools and the infrastructure to create an ad network that targets a particular demographic without you needing to write any code or host any applications. For instance, you could create your own ad network to target a home and garden demographic in the same way that Fusion Ads is a network that targets a design professional demographic. We aren’t Fusion Ads or The Deck Network, rather we enable you to be the “Fusion Ads” for your particular demographic or niche.
We just put up our public facing site yesterday and I am sure there is a lot more we can do to better explain how we are positioned in the market or what makes us different. If you have any more questions or comments, we’d love to answer them.
https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/plldnnbdlbgbiknj...
For United States Edge Locations it is $0.17 per outbound GB for the first 10TB. So using between 0MB and 1024MB will cost you $0.17. Use 1025-2048MB and you will be charged $0.34.
Still though, I suppose some sort of site-scraped data (perhaps hosted on google apps for everyone to use) could be used in tandem with a greasemonkey script to further enhance the site without taking away the interactivity, that could be interesting...
I wrote a greasemonkey script for HN a while back that I can't live without now. There are actually a couple great HN greasemonkey scripts out there. You could always try making a mashup of those that have your favorite elements. You may end up making something that a lot of people find useful.
If you like, give Hacker News OnePage a whirl: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/30512
One weird quirk, on the Distiller page, when I came to that page from the Voltmeter, I found the site url I was checking was populated over the top of the instructions in the input box. (Win 7, Chrome 4.0249)
You are right about that. I suppose I was just speculating on why the author was including <strong> as a no no. That the thought of "I am 'stronging' this text" didn't indicate significance to him while "I am 'emphasizing' this text" related significance to him. In which case, <strong> would seem like just another name for <bold> while not denoting importance.
I myself did not clearly understand that <strong> was actually more "powerful" than <em>. I appreciate you clearly stating the relationship between <strong> and <em>.
Perhaps the author feels that only <em> should be used to place "emphasis" on the text in question, and that it should also be used instead of <strong> as strong doesn't give as clear an impression of importance as <em>.
I think you are just fine using <strong> in places where it is appropriate.
Full link: http://thenextweb.com/appetite/2009/10/30/breaking-google-wa...
This seems like they will be painting the 17+ rating with an awfully broad brush. Could this really be Apple's best solution to rating apps?