Be careful of what you are claiming. The http://videoprofessor.com homepage says "After your 10-day free trial, if you decide to keep the complete set, we'll conveniently bill your credit card just $289.95."
623 karma · joined March 27, 2009
Be careful of what you are claiming. The http://videoprofessor.com homepage says "After your 10-day free trial, if you decide to keep the complete set, we'll conveniently bill your credit card just $289.95."
But it's been 30 minutes and the exercise appears to have failed. Maybe what I should have done is spend some time contributing ideas of my own before opening it up to others. Or maybe I should have linked to the voting page instead of the description page.
These days I work at a creative agency and although there's no dress code I have to collaborate with co-workers and rich clients. If I wore my most comfortable frayed, discolored, "liberal" clothes I'd feel lots more creative but would fear for my job. I'm not Michelangelo or a scientist, I'm just building web sites. But there are serious artists here who work with me and they dress "tidy, neat, liberal." When they wear shorts and sandals, it looks good. The reason is, they spend their money on beautiful clothes. There's a conscious way to do progressive and then there's a poor, just rolled out of bed, I don't care way.
Workers may flag any HIT they feel violates Mturk policy. Flagged requesters risk getting banned by staff.
I sympathize with your situation. I wonder if it would do any good to challenge each person who taps your shoulder. How about: "You really startled me. I was concentrating and your touch felt like a lightening bolt. No harm done but in the future would you mind approaching my desk more from the front? I'd really appreciate it. So would my cardiologist."
Shogun
It filters the boring moments well. The Animals and YouTube ZeitGeist examples opened my eyes.
Just for fun I tried to stump it with a video I had personally edited. See before and after: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/1704650/hlcamtest.html. Pretty good result, all things considered.
Time to plug my own editing startup: http://videothink.com. Host any video file and I will personally cut all the boring moments and serve you the highlight movie. The site is very minimal now but it works.
Then select: label incoming messages, archive incoming messages, and Yes, i want to be able to send mail as x.
To read messages from another account, click its label. To send mail as another account, click the From dropdown.
Here's an idea: a card with a magnetic strip on each of its 4 (or 6 or 8) edges. Now instead of carrying multiple cards you carry just one. If you use both sides of the card, you could fit 16 mag strips on an octagonal card.
I'll bet that group of 5-10% is upset. They probably visited a "success" URI and naturally thought they were charged. If you find them (via the buyerEmail return parameter) don't tell them the problem is with Amazon, the truth is you didn't follow the developer doc: error-checking is your responsibility.
If you were using FPS you would get a more descriptive error. Your transaction status would be something like 'initiated', 'reinitiated' or 'temporary_decline' and for those you don't announce the error to the customer you just let FPS keep trying until you get a success or a (descriptive) fail. Net, FPS lets you better manage edge cases e.g. when the pipes fail.
Keep in mind the payments dashboard is for anyone with an amazon.com account so it's like hacking with mittens. It's not meant to be a full interface to FPS or even Simple Pay. You should not be doing your transaction error checking there. The reason Amazon Payments is "not able to provide transaction partners any information about a failed transaction" is because the failure is occurring within the context of an API and that API already informs you how to interpret all possible errors.
I guess there is another way to reach that error form after all. Looks like a user experience bug. Good catch.
"FPS has a thousand error states, and payments fail all the time with little to no explanation."
I am live on FPS and have seen zero failed transactions apart from those in testing I intended to see fail. By chance was your transaction amount in the form $x.7x or $x.8x? If you were in the sandbox putting a 7 or 8 in the tenths place is the documented way to guarantee a failed transaction and receive a generic error.
"Good luck with the resolution process, too."
Did you search the developer forum? If you did and couldn't resolve your issue, did you post your scenario and relevant code? The community and AWS staff are usually very helpful if you are polite and can describe your problem clearly.
As for this new PayPal API, I just read the developer doc and although it's missing a lot of information PayPal is obviously cooking up a service that may rival FPS. Regarding your point about massive complexity I agree the documentation can be a little confusing. Once we see PayPal's full version we'll be able to compare them side-by-side but one thing is for sure, neither was intended to be plug-and-play.
What I'm concerned about with Adaptive Payments/FPS/Checkout/etc is the friction point introduced by the co-branded UI. Each of these payment services requires you to send your customer away to log into PayPal/Amazon/Google and stay there for a couple of screens. As developers the big question is whether the programmatic features outweigh the conversion loss from defecting customers who feel the experience is unprofessional.
One small observation I have about the web version is that in Step 1 the "words you've added" section felt a little redundant. The user already sees a nice preview of the Bingo card as it is being updated. So each word the user adds to the card eventually appears on the screen three times. Since the Bingo card updates lag the "words you've added" updates the resulting user experience is a little confusing. But functionally everything I tried in this step worked, so good job on the word-lists controller - methods new (post) and edit (put) handled my mistakes (e.g., too few words) flawlessly.
Steps 2 and 3 in the web version made sense and the resulting pdf I downloaded looked great. You make a decent case for registering during step 3. At first I didn't understand the line "use 604 bingo activities any time you want to" but I soon realized that's a reference to your library of premade cards, which I tried and thought was a super feature.
When you introduce this web version into the home screen layout, you might want to pump it as the #1 option above the PC and Mac versions. Otherwise it might be too confusing because while the copy on your site is well-written it's pretty verbose. I would want to abstract out some of your sales pitch and whittle down the benefits - although this is maybe personal taste. As you iterate you might try to get the "a picture is worth a thousand words" screenshots higher in the flow. Also you should update those screenshots because the end result today looks significantly better than your images. That may be affecting your conversion.
As I understand you, the sole reason for purchasing a license is to remove the watermark and footnote. I notice however that neither the watermark nor the footnote seeps into the Bingo card. Since people are already using a scissors or a paper cutter to trim the (multiple cards per page) hardcopy it seems trivial for them to also crop away your branding. Assuming it's technically feasible I might inconvenience the nonpayers a bit more by positioning my watermark directly on the cards. But I see you have 1,800 paying customers - so it is me who should be asking you for suggestions.
Forget the HD version unless you have a wicked graphics system. /homeHD.mp4 (1.4 GB) choked my MBP and bounced an AppleTV.
Before you solicit more PR for Browseology I would tighten the story focusing on the homepage. You have a pleasant, simple aesthetic but IMHO the homepage contains too many words and options. The result is an unnecessarily confusing first impression. My notes: http://idea.s3.amazonaws.com/browseology.png
You might want to gear Browseology more toward women. Women love shopping and they're more social about it than men. I can imagine your app serving their sensibilities better with a little wordsmithing. This might make PR easier for you because it would focus your messaging on benefits rather than features.
Originally we were told all these boxes did was equitably enforce speed and red-light laws efficiently at a great profit over human officers. But now it's turning into "Oh and by the way we'll be photographing the innocent non-violators too." Maybe we need an outside group of hackers to act in an oversight capacity. Or maybe we should just design that license plate switching feature from Knight Rider so if you do speed you're giving someone else a ticket. (Note to Sherriff Joe: I'm just kidding.)
I am reminded of that scene in the movie Brazil when a bug literally falls into a government computer, the suspect's name gets misspelled and an innocent person is punished for what another (innocent) person did. I just hope the two Phoenix based companies working on this camera technology, Redflex and American Traffic Systems, operate on a higher set of principles than GoDaddy headquarters which is just down the street and given its turnover possibly a significant source of traffic company employees.