443 karma · joined November 1, 2010
If this is ever not true of your manager at any company in any industry, then the manager sucks and you should leave (if you have the means). If the manager wants to do this but the company doesn’t let them, then the CEO suck and you should leave.
It’s also interesting how formats have evolved. Older journals like Nature and Science used to have a “letters” section--essentially letters to the editor. They were brief (200-300 words) and started with “Dear sirs”, like an actual letter. Today, a “letter” in the same journals is essentially a whole (short, 2-3 page) paper, like this one: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1578-4
More science authors should read writing advice like this.
I don’t think anyone has solved access control, not Facebook, Google, OneDrive, or even Apple.
2) Even with a mechanism like the above, part of the issue with communication/social data like Gmail is that you can’t control your own privacy perimeter, because the other party could inadvertently leak your data through another app they connect
1. Transitioning to management or tech lead is not a promotion, but a change in responsibilities (and transitions back are common);
2. Whether manager or IC, we only promote people based on demonstrated ability, not potential, to avoid the Peter Principle
- Payments flow kept going down because of lack of reliability in our CI, so I rebuilt the job queueing system to get to 99% reliability
- Most of our business is outside of the US, so we invested in better CDN routing, got a 50% improvement in our web TTIs
- We weren’t able to deploy code often because of our monolith, so we moved to a service-oriented architecture in order to speed up development
If candidates can’t justify why a project happened and why it helped either the company or their team, then that candidate isn’t a senior engineer, they’re just someone taking marching orders.
- More people who know how to operate it
- A greater portion of its failure modes that are known, with workarounds
- Mature tooling and libraries
New technologies need a compelling reason that their pros will outweigh the above incumbent benefits.
So focusing specifically on US workers, not immigrants.
For "solid" tumor cancers like breast, pancreatic, prostate, and skin cancer, we're still struggling to make a dent in the death rate.
For more experienced candidates, we've swapped out most of the whiteboard questions for several other types of interviews, including in-depth technical discussion of one of their past projects, a discussion of how to architect a non-trivial system, and a more soft-skills interview on how they work with others, break down projects, and so on. This gives us a much rounder picture of a candidate, and allows candidates who are very good at something to shine a bit more.