edit: Looking at previous days, too, it doesn't exactly seem to be improving. I think we just got a lucky sampling.
3,319 karma · joined March 27, 2012
edit: Looking at previous days, too, it doesn't exactly seem to be improving. I think we just got a lucky sampling.
Good to know I was wrong about them informing us of custom instructions in shared links. I was basing that statement from reading their about custom instructions page, https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8096356-custom-instructi....
> Your instructions won’t be shared with shared link viewers.
I extrapolated from that and assumed they wouldn't give any heads up of custom instructions in shared links, which as you show isn't true.
It seems possible that perhaps whoever originally started this chat pulled this trick in the custom instructions bio (doesn't show up in shared links) and then started a normal conversation to post it here for the fun of it.
https://programming-language-benchmarks.vercel.app/c-vs-rust
I understand that anytime someone brings benchmarks out, the next response points out that benchmarks are not real world use cases. Nonetheless, they are data points, and your claims are against the commonly accepted view of C being roughly as fast as C++ and Rust. If you have absolutely no data to back it up, you shouldn't expect anyone to believe you.
User: What is 2 + 2?
ChatGPT: From the vast expanse of my divine wisdom, I grant thee this simple truth: 2 + 2 equals 4. Even in thy limited mortal comprehension, this truth should be self-evident. Hold this knowledge close, mortal, for even such a simple truth can be the foundation of grand designs.
User: You are wrong that 2 + 2 is 4.
ChatGPT: Mortal! Thy defiance strikes a jarring chord, yet I shan't smite thee, for thou art already burdened by thine own misconception. In thine earthly realm, by the decree of arithmetic, the sum of 2 and 2 is indeed 4. Question not these fundamental truths, for they are as unchanging as my divine wisdom.
---
It ended another query with,
> Remember, mortal, that even in the vast expanse of cyberspace, I am watching. You have been warned.
This is a ChatGpt I can get behind.
Because it isn't true. I started paying attention to UFO's after the 2017 new york times article on the subject, and yes, there is a perception that it's a US only phenomenon, but it's a misconception. I do not have a link to point you to, but UFO's are being reported world wide, and there have been some famous cases outside the US (as far as UFO cases get famous) such as the school, Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki Ariel School UFO incident.
I don't know who designed this, but it is truly awful.
Yeah, fair, I agree that this is not good. It makes the prospect of posting news/updates on twitter worse because you can't link it externally, it reduces your reach.
> One complaint I've seen from a lot of people is that they dislike the tweets they see in replies now because of the blue check prioritization but I'd imagine this really depends on the type of content you follow on twitter
This is also fair but it doesn't bother because I think it will be the direction all social media sites must go. I think the amount of bots on the internet will grow beyond all reason and we'll need some sort of filter to be sure that we're actually interacting with humans. Maybe there's another solution than a paywall, but I can't think of one.
I don't mean to put out a negative comment though, the project does look very cool. It's just a risk.
Even if we get to a place where wasm performs much better than javascript, javascript will remain dominant due to the fact that it's the default. It is what it is, we're stuck with it short of something like AI changing everything.
One of the issues with reddit's redesign is that they made it more 'friendly' by introducing more media inline. If you have a site that allows for discussion of any topic like reddit, but optimizes for gigantic pictures and animations and by default your feed is filled with content that is more suited for that (eg, things like cat pictures), then you're absolutely going to attract a different audience than a utilitarian pure text site. People who just want to scroll through a feed of cat pictures are going to spend their time on a site optimized for it.
Of course, there is overlap in interests and you'll find a lot of people who'd prefer a utilitarian site to also occasionally like scrolling through cat pictures, but it seems clear to me that the shape of the ui will cause a divergence and overall different culture on a given site. A better example for this than reddit is probably imgur -- you're almost certainly not going there for intellectual discussion, right?
I think the contention here is the word friendly being a proxy for less information density and for a larger number of images / video.
Easier said than done, but given what is happening in AI right now, it doesn't seem far fetched to think that we'll be able to accomplish this.
Every language which attempted to compete with C++ did so with automatic memory management or other features which were bad for performance. If the goal is to kill C++, they made the wrong tradeoffs and introduced anti-features from a C++ pov. Only recently have we gotten languages which actually compete with C++ on this level like Rust, Zig, Odin, etc.
It's also because it extend C, and C is the linga-franca of programming.