(Of course, everyone thinking that this is even remotely the same thing as Google Instant is also completely missing the real innovations in that product.)
400 karma · joined April 27, 2010
(Of course, everyone thinking that this is even remotely the same thing as Google Instant is also completely missing the real innovations in that product.)
http://code.djangoproject.com/timeline
Looks like the 1.2.2 security release they did earlier this week was a bit rushed, partially because the security issue was reported via the public bug tracker instead of the security contact address.
The real lesson here is for yourself and others here who think like you -- if you tell yourself that things like this take superhuman efforts, how will you ever be able to produce something creative yourself?
"Today’s doodle is not related to a birthday but is fast, fun and interactive, just the way we think search should be."
and mentions that there's a Google press conference tomorrow.
http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2010/08/google-live-search-...
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66Q4BJ20100727
"... many in the psychiatric community are worried that the further the guidelines are expanded, the more likely it will become that nobody will be classed as normal any more."
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/gmail/label?lid=613f70...
Didn't they do something similar with the Pacman thing? Sounds like they don't have enough computers with working speakers...
"Priority Inbox will be rolling out to all Gmail users, including those of you who use Google Apps, over the next week or so."
(the http://bit.ly/sitestreams_doc link goes to http://dev.twitter.com/pages/site_streams)
"If you can type, you can make movies."
(But sure, from playing a bit with the feature, it sure looks like Twitter is drowning out everyone else.)
Here's the sound effect program he was using, btw:
1. While the page is loading, look at the utm_source crap in the URL and wonder why the submitter couldn't be bothered to clean that up.
2. Read the first sentence and identify this as a writer of the "I should start with a personal anecdote to make people like me" school of writing (a US thing? not sure), and start skimming for the actual content.
3. Slow down when the "Anders Ericsson" anchor appears, and wait for the mandatory "10,000 hours" reference.
4. Skim the six points, and realize that there's nothing new here -- you've read the same article before, only written by someone else.
(yeah, yeah, I'll log off now.)
I also assume that you know all the basic interviewing stuff (be yourself, don't try to bullshit them, don't panic, etc).
Skype was a European company, of course, and the headquarter and engineering office is still there. A slightly different perspective, perhaps?
(All your HN submissions are links to that site, btw. What's your relation to them?)
The buyers (i.e. the people being defrauded) might disagree.