Yes.
"there isn't really a domestic/whistleblower angle"
As if Chinese goods don't get sold within the US[0].
387 karma · joined October 27, 2013
Yes.
"there isn't really a domestic/whistleblower angle"
As if Chinese goods don't get sold within the US[0].
The problem is with the legislature (and the judiciary), voters, and the media.
Really now? Is that the official reasoning for not using HTTPS?
I think the take on ZH's reporting seems rather correct. If the controls only apply to Citibank then the phrasing of the the article's headliner is a bit much. As for the meat of the subject Citibank has been a laggard[0] entity for some years, after the great recession and all.
I never said anything about "trading tips," just that ZH has proven itself to be built upon a pile of rumor mill excrete.
edit: Really, no comment on why a story about _friggin space_ would be dis-interesting to a consumer due to NYTimes-like article handling that can fail on edge cases?
Consider the Apollo missions if a CJ[0] portal failed in delivering promised content, what the user clicks a link for. Maybe I care too bloody much about every nation's space program than to give time to a probable advertising redirect.
In the end the search engine content shell game really annoys users, don't expect positive results from it.
In hackeracy this is to be viewed in the light of the BlueCoat[1] surveillance log leaks from hardware the regime was using at ISP level to monitor sexual, religious, political users during what was now considered relatively peaceful times. Street level gestures matter little to the surveillance state or it's monitoring of you and your family.
...
Also the large segment around them that still feel dismissive about their now confirmed fears.
edit: Bring a response instead of a down-vote. This community's weak point is when discussion is put to the wayside in favor of a quick and easy up or down vote. More to the point: Eff off anonymous down-voters, a prison guard is not a bread winner in a sexual assault relationship. This is just a really bad analogy that shouldn't be given support.
Correctional facility is what they call them, yep.
Let's see the numbers for those released that continue the relationship, call THAT consensual instead. What the article speaks of is sexual assault.
Now penetration overall is a bit of a different story, Africa's remote areas are still rather remote.
You really didn't conflate my detailing mass murder with support for other murderers at all there. If you did one could say it would be highly detrimental to discussion. Good thing you didn't though.
edit: I do love me tried and true tactics like what inanov and throwaway display. Anything said against a subject they feel strongly about is means to deny what is said then distort who is speaking. At the very least a lot of accusations and insinuations not relating to the original subject being discussed will be brought up adding noise to the signal. For a very topical example here is the regime's Syrian State TV split screening opposition talking at Geneva2 with stock footage of bombing carnage[0].
"Syrian government officials could face war crimes charges in the light of a huge cache of evidence smuggled out of the country showing the "systematic killing" of about 11,000 detainees, according to three eminent international lawyers.
The three, former prosecutors at the criminal tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Sierra Leone, examined thousands of Syrian government photographs and files recording deaths in the custody of regime security forces from March 2011 to last August."
OK so you are adamant that it was not the regime who tortured and executed people, that the photos were due to those nasty Islamists. How about a report pre-dating the previous on the Assad regime's Raid Brigade, amongst others in the Damascus area. Was the industrious kidnapping and murder of detainees by military also a false flag? Branch 215, Raid Brigade - Military Intelligence Division - Damascus[1].
[0] http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/20/evidence-indust...
[1] http://www.vdc-sy.info/index.php/en/reports/1380463510#.UuIv...
All this while their regime goes about talking peace at Geneva2 and dropping crude air dropped improvised explosives (ADIED) onto residential neighborhoods. From two days ago, one of the happier videos to report from these strikes, a child being pulled alive from concrete rubble[2]. In addition to the regular munitons dropped on a daily basis the rocket system used to launch chemical weapon attacks is parked at the regime's Mezzeh military airport in Damascus[3] yet SEA and company have been trying to co-opt and seed disinformation on the subject such as focusing on nosecones[4].
This "cyberwar" mess has very real ramifications, and those are heaps of tortured/executed prisoners stacked up wrapped in plastic[5] with death certificates fraudulently made by the state. Real A level war crimes stuff. I have great hatred for these electronic shills and the murder they help further.
[0] http://wiki.echelon2.org/wiki/Persona_Management
[1] http://www.interpretermag.com/the-massacre-in-syria-that-was...
[2] http://youtu.be/-m_IgNakiXc
[3] http://imgur.com/gallery/C45Cw
[4] http://whoghouta.blogspot.com/2013/09/umlaca-simulation.html
[5] https://twitter.com/anadoluagency/status/426287533689815040
edit: See helpful comment regarding naming below.
I did not say that it was, just that the property owner has much incentive to be proactive about not having cameras facing the projector screen. Why? There are federal laws against the act of filming copyrighted media in such a manner.
Get it? When federal laws come into play, on private property?
Aside from that, sure why not? Prank.
Here is a live feed of the scene, which is essentially an on-going street battle now[5].
[1] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BelRC9RCUAAbRNZ.png [2] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BelT6nzCcAAWytp.jpg [3] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BeljSy1CMAANJFo.jpg [4] https://pbs.twimg.com/media/BelVNWSCQAAr1l-.jpg [5] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jrZcAsPKK74
edit: Video of the police scuffling with citizens in the street during the man's shooting then dragging his body away, along with an interview with the man that filmed it was submitted and published by the BBC[1].
OK buddy, you got me. Go wear cameras into prohibited areas on private property, specially those where federal law comes into play.
I recall the patent[1] by Apple that was aimed at turning off recording functionality at events, with a concert being used as an example. Cell service left intact while your device's sensors refuse to cooperate with recording a video.
Of course that creates a whole other set of potential problems now doesn't it? :)
[1] http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=H...