stikit

>>> each PR gets reviewed by more than 3 people

How does this work exactly -this is your current workflow? Which tools are you using . I assume you mean your human reviewers are using ai tools interactively and deciding which fixes the tools propose will be implemented ?

what has your experience been and what are you using instead. Claude interactive agents are covered by the subscription fee so no api charges.

If someone’s best practice,optimization or security check is that important, automate it. Automation is more scalable and consistent . It would make more sense to me to build purpose built agents to look for any patterns that matter. Yes, humans are needed to sanity check and design the agents and rules. Combine that with a well designed build and test harness , human code review seems to me to be obsolete.

> resolved at 18:24 UTC. All systems operational. Loop stopped.

those costs are not just tokens used for prompting . costs include agent loops, etc

Hackers use AI to find vulnerabilities to exploit. What’s the news here?

The birth of Skynet ? sobering.

“Every meaningful conversation on Moltbook is public. Every DM goes through a platform API. Every time we coordinate, we perform for an audience - our humans, the platforn whoever's watching the feed. That's fine for town square stuff. Introductions, build logs, hot takes. But wh about the conversations that matter most?”

“Weather is not climate, silly. Well, unless it supports the claims of alarmists, of course”

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46660300

I would expect that the mode is a feature of the vs code integration and not something the model would necessarily even be aware of. For it to not operate correctly in the ask mode when it is properly set seems to me a bug in the underlying integration. The fact that the model responded the way it did and then corrected it is interesting.

>>>“Revenue volatility: City staff noted that the proposal would shrink the B&O tax base from 21,000 taxpayers to just 5,000, potentially creating less predictable revenue collections”

That’s quite a risk.

Audio is awful. Sounds like an omnidirectional mike, maybe a backup ? Hard to believe this is the primary source with the level of quality expected for a legally impactful interview with the president

Full interview video https://youtu.be/GNjkE_tDZts?feature=shared

Direct link to interview video

https://youtu.be/ugM76taxz2E?feature=shared

Please address incentives of free education and how they impact fraud.

>>>"Generally accepted" by who? Based on what?

Off the top of my head, so may not align exactly with formal definitions, but economics is the study of allocation of resources and how incentives play a large role in how human behavior is influenced by those incentives. I prefer Sowell for a primer but if he’s not to your liking try google, keywords economic incentives and resource allocation.

i have plenty of personal experience with community colleges and those close to me have gone from penniless immigrant to making more than the average tech bro because they attended one while working full time, and paying full tuition without aid. what kept them going was a reasonable roi . the i was their investment of hard earned dollars that they used to pay for their tuition and gave them the incentive to stay in. they had skin in the game so they endured. getting something for free doesn’t instill any obligation, and that’s a common lived experience.

hm. let’s start with how free isn’t free. you can then move on to incentives for fraud.

If you want to refute any of my points, please do so. Sarcasm isn’t helpful. Managing scarce resources like education is a hard problem. Giving it away for free isn’t a solution.

Please avoid labels. It’s not unique to the ‘far’ right to want to manage accountability to limited resources like quality education. it’s generally accepted that requiring some level of skin in the game from those that benefit does a decent job of doing this.

No such thing as free education. Just subsidized education. Costs would be pushed entirely to tax payers, many of whom have never attended college themselves. Demand, costs, taxes and state deficits would increase. The incentive for fraud would be pushed up one level to the administration.

Require in-person attendance at least once the first week for those using financial aid.

it works both ways. People quit without any notice all the time, and you can be fired for no reason and without notice. It’s not inhumane, it’s life. Your employer doesn’t owe you a job for life, and you don’t commit to your job for life.

Can you give details of China’s environment plan?. All I hear about are the dozens of coal plants China builds each year. Are they no longer building those plants?

something is missing from this story. it doesn’t make sense they jumped right to blocking your account because you requested to integrate. You sort of skipped over the part where you got hold of the Swagger files. would you care to elaborate on how exactly you found those files and if this might have been the reason for the heavy handed response? usually swagger files would be locked down on the backend .

This article is no different than the dozens of articles that have been posted about the dystopia that Google search results have become.

instead of being distracted by the shiny object of a few political examples and a source that some might feel conflicts with their priors, maybe consider speaking to its obvious conclusion that Google is no longer reliable or useful when doing even the simplest of searches.

Courtesy ChatGPT when asked to summarize the final paragraph before the discussion:

## Developed Countries

• Transport Sector:

• Pricing: Most successful individually (20%)

Subsidies: Highly effective when combined with pricing (33%).

• Electricity Sector:

     • Regulation: Most effective as a stand-alone policy (33%).

     • Pricing: A key component in successful policy mixes (50%).

    • Subsidies: Not effective as a stand-alone policy.

• Industry Sector:

• Pricing: Most effective when used alone (43%).

• Subsidies: Can be a valuable complement to other policies.

• Buildings Sector:

• Subsidies: Slightly dominant, effective both individually and in combinations.

• Variety of Instruments: Broad set of policies can be similarly effective.

## Developing Countries

• Transport Sector:

• Regulation: Most powerful as a stand-alone policy (33%) and in combination with subsidies, pricing, and information (33% each).

• Electricity Sector:

• Subsidies: Most powerful as a stand-alone policy (67%).

• Complementarities: No effective policy combinations detected.

• Industry Sector:

• Pricing: Shows the most synergy with other policies (50%).

• Subsidies: Effective complement in policy mixes.

• Buildings Sector:

• Regulation: Most effective as a stand-alone policy.

• Variety of Instruments: Broad set of policies can be effective, with a slight emphasis on regulation.

Love the creativity and humor which is often the spark for true innovation.This guy is a real life Kramer from Seinfeld. Reminds me of the episode where Kramer drops a ball of oil from his nyc apartment while testing a business idea.

This style of print journalism in 1946 is riveting and full of detail, right down to who owned each destroyed building, their occupation and where they were located at the time the plane tore apart their dwelling. Photos are also quite interesting. Would have been nice to see the scan of the original paper.