3,884 karma · joined July 22, 2009
It's often funny and quite informative.
The quoted part from Seth Godin sounds like it goes against what the author stands for, as it sounds very salesy.
I personally think it'll stay a standalone company because its founders already have plenty of money (from Auctomatic and presumably from taking money off the table during Stripe's funding rounds) and seem intensely motivated to change the world by having a pivotal role in increasing the GDP of the internet (as stated in the article).
That, coupled with its (both the company and its founders) integrity, culture, and care & empathy for people (employees, investors, customers, partners, underserved and underestimated people and markets, and really almost anyone) seems to indicate to me that its core values and objectives will be best served and achieved as an independent entity.
Wow.
>An early version of the new design, which we saw during our interview, looks similar to Facebook’s News Feed or Twitter’s Timeline: A never-ending feed of content broken up into “cards” with more visuals to lure people into the conversations hidden underneath.
>“We want Reddit to be more visually appealing,” he explained, “so when new users come to Reddit they have a better sense of what’s there, what it’s for.”
I fear this major re-design will be a mistake. HN is designed similarly to Reddit and if HN ever tried to do a major re-design, I think I would visit it less. I keep coming back to it because of its stories, comments, and its simplicity and minimalism. It has good content and is very easy to use and navigate.
TIL.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/audio/2017-07-14/ed-thorp-the...
I guess my question is what's a practical, good outcome for an angel investor when a company exits? Or what rate of return do the most successful angel investors have?
I'd love to hear from other angel investors with (perhaps) different experiences and opinions.
https://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/10/20/livingsocial-buys-ur...
On the other hand, I think there are several "unicorns" that are still private that will do well as public companies -- Dropbox, Lyft, Stripe, and Airbnb. The success of these in the public markets will help the startup ecosystem and encourage venture capital funding.
With that said, I find the case of Blue Apron interesting. I have a hunch that it may have thought its best chance to go public and cash in was now -- that the environment for "unicorns" like itself (one that faces substantial competition, a weak product, fickle customer behavior, lack of customer retention and unstable cash flow) will only get worse.
I hope each and every person is exposed and held accountable for their actions.
It's inspiring to see all the women who are standing up and speaking out about these issues.
And that was an interesting interview, thanks for the link.
But feeling that way, at least initially, about a startup that becomes big often seems to share that characteristic.
That's astounding.
It's designed in a way to make the user (e.g. anyone who likes music) just want to play with it in a way that's very intuitive via its simple, visual layout. And it provides instant feedback that makes you want to continually tinker with it to make something that you like more and more.
Web development/programming training tool makers should really take note of this.
Some of the companies I'd be thrilled to see included:
Airbnb Stripe Uber Lyft Slack Robinhood Palantir Snap Instacart SpaceX GitHub DraftKings Warby Parker OfferUp