stereoradonc

Give him sync for free! Or atleast let me sponsor the kid.

The context of the statement was different, and you took it to a whole different level. A browser wrapper is a wrapper by any other name. Linux is different.

I completely agree. Shifted to Mullvad for this reason, precisely. Definitely not touching anything from Proton. It's Kryptonite.

Good for you!

Any proof?

There's a reason I didn't rely on the WikiPedia! It can be edited.

15 years here. This is the third time in my time period that it has been down. I have zero incentive to move to anything else.

One of the worst write ups trying to drum up "support" for a product known to hallucinate. I couldn't imagine this could land up here!

Where's the alternative, dude? You'd want a annointed clown in their place?

This is the killer feature I was missing! Pay money for usage and the way the app interacts with users, and they have crossed their hearts that they won't "spy" on us (which can change any other time in their terms and conditions). Who wants to bet they will find a way to stuff "privacy focused apps" in the vault? Why not?

Thank you!! Excellent effort!

The "Swiss version of neutrality" is an overblown concept and carefully constructed narrative.

Proton is overrated on most aspects; Fastmail is a better alternative to Proton Mail. Dropbox better than Proton Drive. (I understand you are paranoid about it, but just mentioning it is still better technically).

I implemented the SOCKS5 proxy, and I hardly get any. Shifted from ProtonVPN to Mullvad; rock solid connection; great app. Totally worth the investment. ProtonVPN's app is clunky, and I am not happy with it. Besides, zero Linux support despite the premium charge. I am not affiliated with Mullvad, but this represents an excellent value for money. I still have to try Windscribe. I have heard good things about them.

Firefox does everything about privacy that Vivaldi should do (and more).

And yet another ++1 for Inoreader. I don't find the need to consider the "alternatives"

The UK now replaces Nigeria. Bravo! It's come a long way.

Brilliant idea.

I have some ideas for a collaboration. Can you share your Twitter ID or any other social media profile? Better will be a Telegram ID. Cheers! This simple idea can be repurposed in other domains.

I'll shed a tear

Kiwi Browser on Android supports extensions. Have a look at it.

This is an excellent implementation! Thanks for this chrome extension! Works across most websites. Why not have a feedback button and check on websites where it doesn't work?

Awaiting more updates; I'd be interested in a premium feature set too. Please have a website to provide direct access through email, if possible.

There's no specific "timeline". In channels, once you reach the end of posts, swipe and pull up, and you are taken to the next channel. Channels work as broadcast lists (with unlimited subscribers). This is not determined by algorithms. You manually have to subscribe to a channel.

I immediately liked the way you described the snake-oil. Bravo!

I am not defending Telegram, but as a social media application (and a private chat option), Telegram is only complying with existing laws. Copyright materials are a taboo on ANY electronic medium (including the open web). We just had a major issue around the Z-Library. Each time anything of this sort happens, I see the Signal users coming out from no-where. These news aren't a big deal, and numerous public channels have faced the axe. Most of them have changed tactics by going "private" by rapidly changing their invite links or using bot services to "verify users" before they join. Public groups earlier sharing copyright materials are "banned". There are numerous bots that connect to torrents and upload content to Telegram. Z Library still serves content; Nexus bots have just rolled out a feature to connect your bot (through API token). Signal serves a specific niche of users, and I think polarising arguments (or moralistic stands) are only to play to the gallery.

When will the world Apple's duplicity? They are NOT private, secure or consumer friendly.

A terrible product (none for Firefox) and has a user hostile attitude to export your data. Avoidable.

Where do you have time to read with this level of complexity!

I am not surprised (or "shocked"). Despite the privacy snafus, it still remains ingrained in the user's habits. Unless the company crashes and burns, I don't see the end of the road for WhatsApp.

Yet they hold the encryption keys to decrypt your chats on the fly. What inspires so much trust in Meta? Especially in a company with "targeted advertisements" as its business?

Upvoted only for your mathematical skills :-)