946 karma · joined April 13, 2012
Most of the hard part of BI I have seen is joining these pieces of information together that are otherwise uncorrelated -- e.g which clicks corresponded to conversion is a tracking problem, then correlating them with actual business actions (e.g running a marketing campaign or improving a process)
It's more about data joining and data aggregation than "ML"
Even Obama had several instances of drone killings inadvertently killing large groups of civilians -- for example: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/02/19/wedding-became-funeral...
The author spends entire sections on things that are completely unimportant (e.g DNA error correction)... while leaving most of epigenetics and regulatory genomics completely out of the picture.
DNA inside of cells has a 3 dimensional shape within the cell nucleus... The so called "Junk DNA" mentioned in the article can greatly modify the 3D geometry of the DNA and thus insertions or deletions of junk DNA can have large biological consequences (by influencing, for instance, the distance between an enhancer and promoter).
This video provides a nice visual representation of what DNA actually looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pl44JjA--2k
If he thinks this would work then he’s either stupid or it went out in tiny chunks that are not “f** you” money.
The point is that the computational power of the brain may be non-local and non-constrained to the physical dimensions or neural capacity of the brain.
How deeply do you understand these very clear confounding variables?
Apparently the airplane itself was free, but it cost $250k to transport it to the location of filming!