83 karma · joined December 5, 2018
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/niche; my proof: https://keybase.io/niche/sigs/PYgSdidGqbmdbDCb6PTwzqRyJ3beim1pxn9r4xmnZ5o ]
It can be a slippery slope for sure, I think it only works when the entire team buys into the notion that life is always more important than work (which can feel rare over here).
Happy to say this has been working for me and if the attitude started to change, I like to think I would speak up pretty quickly.
I am very grateful for my current company's "unlimited" PTO policy, it's life-changing.
Cost is still a challenge, of course. But I'd like to point out that my current set of aids ($2800 pair) just hit the 5-year mark of usage, and they are still working perfectly. For devices that I use ~16 hours a day, everyday, it's amazing. However, it took 3 visits to the audiologist to get the tuning/fitting just right. For the first month of use, these hearing aids were "garbage" (I was really frustrated). But once we hit the mark, I have had zero complaints ever since.
So, that all said, there is tremendous value to initiatives like the Bose SoundControl Hearing Aids (~$900 pair off-the-shelf hearing aids), but the biggest hurdle they face is the fitting/tuning portion. I've tried them, but they don't fit my ears well, so I can't use them effectively (yet - I want to try adjusting the receiver cables).
I'm hopeful this is just the turbulent beginning of a new hearing aid market that expands access to as many people as possible, because it is far from a solved problem.
But it's also incredibly fulfilling work, and it's a great example of a community-driven effort to accomplish something very important: providing food.
So I think it falls into a similar category of "college is over-emphasized and we have a dwindling supply of trades-workers". While in school in a rural farm town, I never once heard anyone say "what about farming?" when discussing future career choices. It's not marketed as an attractive option. Maybe it's as simple as "farmers have the work-life balance of an emergency room doctor while making ~1/6th" (source: Dad is the farmer, Brother-in-law is the doctor)
Anyway, it's a problem I think about a lot. I didn't get into farming, but in many ways I wish I had, because it's a highly undervalued skill with a very rewarding outcome: you feed communities. How do we change the narrative? Do we need policy changes? Continued technological advancement? A push to educate the next generation of farmers within schools? I'm not sure, but I don't think it's always as simple as saying "it doesn't pay enough". That _is_ an issue, but it's not the only issue.
Purely speculative: but I wonder if the daily lifestyle of a lumberjack, which was largely built around routine, rhythmic work and minimized social interaction (spending months in the woods at a time), coupled with shy tendencies to begin with (lots of lumber camps were completely male and had French/English language barriers = minimal small talk with coworkers), could've resulted in those kinds of reactions. I know that for me, it's easy to fall into a "trance" while doing manual labor for hours at a time, so I'd be curious if the amount of time they spent in that trance could've dampened their...social skills? Social reaction mechanisms? I don't know. Either way, pretty interesting. I'll have to search for some more references!
The area is largely agricultural, and the cancer rate for that region is high compared to the rest of the state (Maine). Hmm.
Resource management intertwined with poor leadership is a common thread in the demise of societies. Our ability to adapt to our environments is impressive, but not nearly as impressive as Mother Nature itself.
I'd love if we took the hint from these histories, because the scale of change in our global climate looks like it'll far exceed past catastrophes. Some days I'm hopeful, but others, quite wary. Hmm.
I didn't realize this (or at least, am surprised it's _twice_ as fast). Apparently the key factor is loss of sea ice. Can anyone ELI5?
I won't dispute your jab at the traditional workplace culture/politics, but I certainly wouldn't assume your personal preferences (and perhaps, the common preference of HNers) is the golden standard.
Many people work better with others "around" and enjoy the company/atmosphere, myself included. Sounds like this product addresses that exact market.
Fascination aside, this is another one of those sobering reminders that whatever I spend my time on as an engineer might be worth absolutely nothing in the near-term, and that's a bit frustrating. What could I be doing to help engineer a better world for future generations? How do I optimize my individual talents so I can achieve the most impact in my lifetime? How do I find the right team of other humans to work toward this? Convince others or myself that it's a worthy cause? (I could care less about legacy or personal comforts/gains - I just want to help humanity move forward, not maintain it)
Could this be the very first "dating app"?! Amazing.
I understand the allure of creating a system that allows the "popular power" to make decisions, but that in itself is a difficult problem to solve.
We couldn't possibly crowd-source how to solve this flooding problem until the majority of that crowd has been educated on several aspects of the issue. Perhaps what the author is implying is that there needs to be a better interface between Politicians/Engineers and the people such that the P/Es say "hey here's our plan, find the flaws" and the people say "here are the flaws"
But there's the difficult problem. There will always be flaws and trade-offs, and this kind of interface eats up large amounts of time that may be better spent implementing a short-term solution to buy a few more years until a long-term solution is reached. It's a catch 22.
The decisions must eventually come down to the P/Es, but maybe we just need to add a few more feedback points into the decision-making system.
Obviously we need both rural and urban areas, but I suppose my "born in a small town" bias wants a better balance between the two than we currently have. For the benefit of both!
Any any industry rooted in the natural resources of an area breeds communities that are located near them. I think most people _prefer_ settling near work if possible.
I guess I find it unfortunate that small but strong communities are a dying breed. A healthy community to live in is an essential part of a quality life. It's quite literally the foundation of modern society, and I sense that the concentration of populations in huge cities is only further compounding the challenges we face (climate change, economic inequality, the overall health of a population)
What exactly does it mean to do "reduced impact logging" in Europe, do you have a link?
Coming from the Northeast where our trees are also of great economic value (and of greater natural value), I completely agree that a more strategic approach to logging should be pursued. But at the same time, we need to develop methods for supporting rural logging towns economically. I'm not sure what the answer is, but ideally it can make use of and build upon existing skill-sets and lifestyles in those areas.
I want to believe that if communities are properly educated and given opportunities to improve their practices, they would.
Maine has done a pretty good job of keeping tourism in check (I would say) despite being labeled the Vacationland, but I wonder if that has to do with our state having a more "plain" natural beauty? For example, Mount Katahdin is obviously impressive for the area, but it is nowhere near as dramatic as mountains out West. Then again, perhaps the strict enforcement of Baxter's vision for a forever "wild Maine" has served us well.
Or perhaps we are fortunate to have fairly brutal winters that give us a break from those who don't snowmobile!