1,936 karma · joined February 23, 2015
blog: https://brianschrader.com microblog: https://mastodon.social/@sonicrocketman
> My own suggested rule of thumb: if the authors cannot convincingly demonstrate that they are able to give a clear, expert-level talk on their results, one that is correct and properly attributed, then the result should not be published. A proof that no human can properly explain should be viewed as incomplete, even if it has been formally verified.
What got you into writing letters?
Everything is related.
https://brianschrader.com/archive/the-practicals-of-writing-...
But I'm in the process of upgrading my pen. I ordered a TWISB ECO.
https://brianschrader.com/archive/on-the-web-the-best-outcom...
This is a valid concern, I think. However I'd point out that extraneous detail and world building are not the same. If information serves the purpose of explaining the world then by definition it isn't extraneous. Though adding information certainly reaches a point of diminishing returns at some point.
I think the point of Chekhov's gun is more that unless you can justify the inclusion of the info, then it is extraneous and extraneous info should be removed.
Mastodon post: https://mastodon.social/@sonicrocketman/113884920858897541
Though after smearing my hands with ink for the past 12 months, I can say that with some practice cursive has turned out to be fine. These days even the dip pen I’m using dries faster than I’m writing.
1. Multiple small notebooks. I love ~50pg, 5"x7" lined notebooks. They're cheap, and portable. Just get one for each project.
2. I usually allow myself 1-2 extra pages for longer thoughts or things that will require follow-up. That almost always works.
3. Indexes. Set aside 20pgs at the front (or back) for a table of contents. I do this with my longer notebooks (~200pgs) and I never have trouble finding things. If you need to continue a section later on call it "Project X (cont.)"
I feel like #3 is something that generations before us knew implicitly that we've forgotten.
[edit: grammar]
[Edit: Addendum]
Also, always date your entries. That helps a lot.
The dip pen is actually just one of those almost-novelty quill-looking ones. I cut off the ornamentation and just use it as a regular dip pen. Works great. It came with a set of nibs including one that is basically just a traditional fountain pen. That nib is the one I use the most.
Importantly, dip nibs often splotch ink because they're coated with oils by the manufacturer. I found out much later that you need to prep the nibs before you use them (either by wiping the oils off or lightly burning it off, which is what I did). That fixed the splotchy-ness for good.
Lately I've been considering some nice wooden dip pens.
Fountain Pen: https://www.amazon.com/Schneider-Fountain-Light-Barrel-16820...
Nib Prep Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VE12e60BA6E
[Edit: Addendum]
Cursive felt slower to me at first, but now writing those print samples in the post felt slower than the cursive sample. It's really important to just practice the strokes. I spent an hour a day for almost two weeks just writing "the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" over an over to get the strokes right.