11,838 karma · joined January 17, 2013
It's semi-paused right now, but I am wondering if I should make it active again. If you like it, I would appreciate your feedback.
How did you find it?
> ” others want to try building things and only once they hit the wall, figure out the background”
I am exactly this type as a software developer. I am ok that I won’t be a computer scientist, nor a very senior engineer working for a state of the art company. Still, I enjoy developing software. I like the daily activity of writing code. Be it a personal project to learn stuff or learning new things at work.
It is kind of limiting in a way (I will never expand the body of human knowledge in software development), but that’s ok for me. It’s liberating in other dimensions too (I am always creating new, if simple, stuff).
Playing for them, sure. But you can play once and invite them to play. Not keeping showing until you think they learned.
Often the role/title is desired for its status and/or money. I think that’s a fair enough motivation actually, except it should not _solely_ be that. You have to want to learn and practice. Or else, counterproductively, you will have less chance to get the role/title.
Showing the music notation to the student = tell
Playing the music to the student = show
Letting the student play the music = engage
Makes sense to me
There is not one mention of werewolf in how it describes the happenings of the time, only when talking about the game.
Very clickbaity title trying to get the attention of those that like to blame “the media” for everything
It seems the author just want to change their career, not necessarily because of they won’t be able to earn money if they don’t.
Specially given the rest of GP comment, OpenAI seems to be the Google, Facebook of the industry and will be the infrastructure company of it (already is kind of)
Even in the case of very young players that are paying to play, it’s the parents money, so not exactly “youthful optimism” that powers it.
” Worth noting that these comics fell within/adjacent to the Franco-Belgian comic tradition (Bande dessinée or BD for short), which have a very different reputation from their American comic book counterparts. Superheroes are, thankfully, approximately non-existent and BDs are generally respected as an art form, and their appeal cuts across a much broader age range.”
There are even a few niche ones where only the women can start a “match”.
> *”because they immediately get a ride close-by”
That’s is unsubstantiated utopia (from you POV). People do not have uniformly distributed locations for starting and ending routes. There are concentrations of where people work, live, go to restaurants, schools, etc. More so if you are assuming suburban homes. The direction of routes also have very strong biases.
You very strongly and, again, unsubstantially overestimate shared rides. Shared rides could already be happening at scale with a human driver and are not. There is nothing about self-driving tech that solves any urbanistic, social or economic barrier to shared rides. Also, a shared ride negates most of the benefits of self driving cabs. You are not alone in the confined space, you are sharing with others, others that will likely be more intrusive than a professional driver. The vehicle will not be as clean, as comfortable, as silent, etc.
About commute getting cheaper seems a pipe dream. There is nothing in the self driving tech remotely indicating that a currently $60 ride will cost $5 with self driving cars.
The final though seemed like a huge leap for me, who don’t know anything about those math mysteries (which I assume is your target audience).
First I was curious to learn how is the fast way to understand that 1, 2, or 4 colors suffice. And why finding out such a way for 3 is so hard.
The zero-knowledge proof demonstration felt like “changing the subject”. Probably I missed the connection there.
You were right in 2019, despite being downvoted. Good call. Congrats
I only made a comment long time ago that Lambda School sounded like a good idea to me and I regret how fool I was.
Edit: btw, bitwise, you were right in 2019, despite your response to my comment being downvoted.
Not in terms of value — I think it is already delivering a lot of value and it will deliver more and more —, nor in terms of finance. Some overspending VC losing their bets does not constitute a bubble. NVidia has a somewhat diversified demand in games, crypto mining and AI. And it’s not negligible the chance of the next software big thing also use GPUs.
I don’t think it will end up being more impactful to humanity than the internet itself, but it will be big and useful.
Sometimes going on talking about minor characters routine is kind of the main point of an author’s intention, but it may read as “filler” by some.
Or something like Brandon Sanderson books, where his fans enjoy spending more time in that universe, but make their novels very long.
Economy with words and filler content might differentiate a good from a bad novel, but not a novel and short story.
Did they never deliver on that promise?
Full disclaimer: I believe that so much that (as a fellow beginner writer) I created a “newsletter” platform more suited for fiction writers to slowly form an audience of readers owning the mailing list.
https://writer.confabulists.com
You still have to keep writing constantly (essays, short stories, chapters of a novel, or even some communication of what you are doing) but it feels more natural for writers to write than to keep posting cute pictures, hot takes or creative short videos.
Also, I added the concept of “books” in my platform, so new subscribers to your newsletter start reading your old stuff (not only your future posts).
Having a newsletter also is very satisfying that you keep some contact with people that like what you write, no matter how few they are.