878 karma · joined June 4, 2011
Pashi is building the operating system for manufacturing. We already work with some of the largest manufacturers in the world, and our software is being brought to bear against some of the thorniest problems that plague the most mission-critical high-volume production processes ever constructed.
We're currently a very small, very technical team spread across India, Europe, and the US, and we're looking for folks with strong backgrounds in programming languages and compilers to help us build better programming abstractions for physical processes.
Email soham@pashi.com with a paragraph-length description of any relevant experience if you're interested.
Happy to answer any questions about the stuff we talked about, and would appreciate any feedback you might have.
FYI, in addition to the audio, there's a complete transcript available on the page as well.
If you're interested in how India's history informs our politics, economy, and foreign relations today, take a look at Today in Indian History, a newsletter which my brother and I recently launched. Four times a week, we lay out the context and consequences of an event in India's past that happened on that date. Link below:
https://honestyisbest.com/today-in-indian-history/
I also launched a podcast about Computer Science research called Segfault.
What's the point of this? Well, Computer Science is composed of many different areas of research -- operating systems, algorithms, and cryptography, for example -- each with their own problems of interest, publications of record, idioms of communication, and styles of thought. What people doing research in these areas actually do, and how that interacts with what people in other areas do, is not usually apparent to folks who haven't spent a lot of time in academia or are just starting out.
Segfault intends to serve as a map of the field, with each episode featuring discussions about the core motivations, ideas, and methods of one particular area, with a mix of academics ranging from first year graduate students to long tenured professors as guests.
If you find the time to listen to it or read the transcript, I'd love to get your feedback.
I have a lot of frustration with this notion of the "visually evident formal properties of the integral" -- I think the existing visual-symbolic paradigm of mathematical notation is intuitive to some subset of people, but that subset does not encompass everyone who could do mathematics at a high level, excluding those for whom some alternate, in this case more text-based, representation is more tractable.