sodality2

That’s not a solution to the coloring problem any more than making everything red was in 2015 (ie, all the tradeoffs mentioned in the article [0] still apply).

[0]: https://journal.stuffwithstuff.com/2015/02/01/what-color-is-...

A large application, maybe, but sometimes you have a very small scope application that won't otherwise use async, so you value binary size, compile time, etc over theoretical XXX ops/sec

It is still logical for someone of any tax bracket to advocate for raising tax rates, while paying their owed taxes and not paying any more.

> Apple chooses the default and integrates it into the OS more deeply than any third-party app can be integrated

And this is well known by everyone, and your family still chose Apple (in fact, I'm fairly certain this is why most people choose Apple - they want everything to "just work"). Apple has no obligation to provide any "ecosystem".

At the end of the day there isn't some mass hypnosis at work here. People choose Apple en masse because it works for them. Nothing stops Apple users from making an SMS (now RCS) group chat, either, nor from you and your family hosting a group chat on any other app on the App Store.

> Family group chats that require a blue-bubble-capable phone

This is a social walled garden they've built over years and has been solidified by users choosing it over and over again. Are they exploiting our brain's capacities regarding social pressure to extract profit? Sure, but so does every fast food company, social media company, marketing company, etc.

I think it's interesting that you phrase it as "require" regarding a group chat made by your family members. Apple doesn't require this, your family members chose Apple when they purchased their phones.

> From what I can tell, Android can't even play two audio streams at once.

This is purely design-decision-based, it has nothing to do with the limitations of the hardware. A laptop with a weaker CPU than a flagship Android could probably stream and play hundreds of audio streams (no promise it'll sound coherent, though).

Jonathan Haidt has written and published huge amounts of posts, papers, and an entire book targeting social media and technology as a whole (not shying away from American-owned media, if anything, specifically targeting them). Literally yesterday, he published the same format of post against Snapchat [0]. Why does reading a single post targeting one social media destroy any credibility at all?

[0]: https://www.afterbabel.com/p/industrial-scale-snapchat

Personally I switched Navidrome since I found the clients to be better and the scanner to be lighter, but there's a few things I miss: casting was nice, as well as centralizing my media on one everything-app.

Wow, I grew up in Yorktown and I remember seeing a lot of tour bikers. Never thought twice about it until now, seems like it's largely a result of the TransAmerica trail. Hope you enjoyed Colonial Williamsburg + Yorktown Beach!

That's such a small scope of an addition I don't see the comparison. I suppose overloading arbitrary types with it can sometimes make the actions performed opaque.

Maybe if you're principally opposed to killing cows for meat, yet still eat burgers, but not if you simply could not be bothered to actually kill the cow.

Cloud will buy less NVDA chips, and since they're related goods, prices will drop.

This is one of my favorite duckduckgo features - adding a single exclamation point after a search (“Tom Hanks IMDB !”) does exactly this

Applying the principle of least resistance to working out is the right way. The best workout will always be the one you can do consistently.

https://matt.might.net/articles/hacking-strength/

Statistically it does matter. If FSD has a 1-in-100M miles driven chance of killing a motorcyclist, and FSD drives 10M miles a day, within 10 days it's likely to see a trend starting. Whereas XYZ other brand may have a 1-in-30M miles driven chance of killing a motorcyclist, but only drives 1M miles a day, so without adjusting, FSD is more dangerous, but in reality, XYZ is.

Yes, you can short a total US market ETF. Or just exit the market and be prepared to enter when the floor is hit (impossible, unless you have outsider knowledge).

Some kind of fall-back mechanism would be nice, then, maybe? As someone who does indeed want it to be accurate, I would prefer to use OFF for any food which exists within their database, since it tends to be much more accurate (and maybe fall back to "AI search" if I want to look up "apple" or whatever).

I understand that most people probably consume more whole foods that might not have the cut-and-dry numbers on OFF. It just does feel like a big lacking feature to just categorically exclude OFF, if I wanted to use it.

> So, very little nutrient info beyond calories and protein. No info about micronutrients. No info about minerals, vitamins, amino acids, fatty acids.

Many items do have these things.

https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/5060495116377/huel-b...

I have to say, irrespective of any concerns about the LLM-generated content, the actual app alone (goal-setting, macro tracking, etc) is the best free iOS-based nutrition-tracking app I've ever used, at first use. It's actually shockingly hard to find good, free (or even one time payment!) ones that don't constantly nag you to upgrade and paywall. I would pay a lot (once) for a nutrition/weight tracking app as slick as this, with all of the goal setting, data graphs, etc, that uses the OpenFoodFacts database, not your own. (Soliciting suggestions!) Please consider making the AI features optional and instead using the OFF database as the primary source.

Also, looks like the Apple Health option in Settings actually opens the start-of-week settings modal.

I used Winterbreak [0] and used the renameotabin extension to block updates.

[0]: https://kindlemodding.org/jailbreaking/WinterBreak/

Got this on my Kindle after the jailbreak came out in January. It's fantastic, especially the OPDB index + self hosted calibre-web means I can just download an epub on any device, drop it on a webpage, then search it on KOReader immediately. I did not want to use USB or Amazon's plumbing to transfer, so this is great. Tons of customization over the built-in reader.

Let’s say a compiler is doing something in a multi-threaded manner - isn’t it possible that ASLR would affect the ordering of certain events which could change the compiled output? Sure you could just set threads to 1 but there’s probably some more edge cases in there I haven’t thought of.

If someone works on and tweaks and gets to know their 25 year old econo beater, I don't think anyone has the right to say they aren't a car enthusiast. It's less about the horsepower (or ghz) and more about the passion put into it. For example you could add an ad-blocking DNS server on your devices and it would work just fine - but if you put in the effort to self-host it, even on a Pi, it's (IMO) a home lab.

Is this actually feasible for some decent percentage of cars nowadays? If so, where did you research?

Trump himself from this article: "And they’re finding what will be hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of fraud — I say waste and abuse."

An interesting thing to note from the article is that this isn't just a garden variety jailbreak/adversarial interoperability with a BLE protocol. It lets you turn someone else's device into an airtag, then track its location.

> In addition, we appreciate the help from the Apple Security Team for their prompt responses and acknowledgement. Apple recently released patches in iOS 18.2, visionOS 2.2, iPadOS 17.7.3, 18.2, watchOS 11.2, tvOS 18.2, macOS Ventura 13.7.2, Sonoma 14.7.2, Sequoia 15.2 to fix the vulnerability. However, the attack remains effective as long as unpatched iPhones or Apple Watches are in the proximity of the computer running our trojan.

Seems like a pretty bad vulnerability to just hope 1.5B iPhones alone update soon enough. I know people still on iOS 17/16... All of them are now complicit.

But I'm happy to see my state represented in security research :)

> If it is, why did no one person team disrupt and totally take over any market anywhere these past couple of years?

If AI is revolutionary, yet ubiquitous (anyone can visit chatgpt.com right now), there won't be these runaway winners in a specific industry; at best, new branches of industries will grow rapidly, and perhaps within an industry progress will intensify.

Nope, just validating the "OSS projects moving to other equivalents" - though it's always a concern!

One of the first things I did was move to Quay.io which is unlimited everything for OSS projects. I was reaching a point where I had 1M+ pulls a month (I suspect some kind of DDoS, accidental or otherwise, for a project with just 1.7k stars) - and not having to even think about the bandwidth or anything was wonderful. It's nice to be supported by Red Hat which I generally consider more benevolent towards OSS as opposed to Docker Hub.

If you specify the fully qualified image location then it's irrelevant. It's only when you decide to use short hand that it comes into concern