1,361 karma · joined February 27, 2007
Anything silly and whimsical.
If you were to look at a teenagers phone and ask "what does this word mean, and this word, and this word." That is our audience. Example: "OMG LOL FML" (clearly you know those words, but your parents may not)
Apple actually rejected our App the first time because our marketing copy was too ridiculous. This is the more reasonable version.
I know that is unusual, but keep in mind nobody downloads an app because it is exactly the same as every other application.
The last era of the net (since 2004) a lot of stuff went full real names, after facebook made it ok to put your name on the internet.
We've started (re) discovering ways to connect which are less about real names.
I'm Paul. One of the creators of WUT.
It isn't a contract just a word choice that guides people to the expectation of how the app works.
facebook login is annoying but did get us out the door. poor grammar is intentional.
We used to have the words "WUT" repeated 200x in the app store copy, but Apple politely told us that wasn't good enough. We had more than a couple people tell us it was great though.
Trying to get more people to actually try out crypto currencies, rather than blog about them.
On the other hand, I really don't like the idea of apple having editorial review over apps for being too simple. The only app which I feel might be too simple is an additional fart or flashlight app. And I'm still inclined to let those be distributed in some way (if not directly through the app store process).
"The integrated card reader keeps information secure from swipe to payment."
That means integrated encryption in to the stand. There are probably some other details. How to mount the thing to the table, how to connect devices.
Edit: disclaimer, former square here. Details matter.
It is a weird world.
(for the record I like marco's work)
The motivations are very similar to startups working outside of larger companies. You get more freedom in work choices and pay scale.
Please add your feedback to the details pads so other people can use it in the future. That is why I posted it on hackpad and not my blog.
EDIT: thanks for the feedback.
Sorry if I wasn't clear of the purpose. I don't love the Amazon documentation and wish people would use Hackpad instead because it would be more up to date.
This is my effort to bootstrap that step by providing and overview and details rather than googling old blog entries ever time I want to setup EC2 with ubuntu.
I've heard this before and I've also heard the exact opposite. That telling other people your goals reduces the chances of finishing them. The theory I remember (I google but was unable to find a good link) was that telling someone a goal feels 60% as good as actually doing the goal itself. So it is easier to just tell everyone your goals and then invent new goals.
I'm not trying to contradict Alex Maccaw. I've just noticed this dichotomy before and been curious how people reconcile the two theories.
Has anyone else noticed these two recommendations or know what I'm referring to?
If you notice that your money is worth more tomorrow, you are going to save your money and spend it tomorrow. This is true in situations of "deflation".
This sounds good to you, because all you have to do is wait and you'll be better off tomorrow. You don't even have to work to get more stuff.
However, you aren't the only person with this idea. Everyone saves their money in the bank. The people who sell goods and services, sell fewer goods, and maybe go out of business.
The economy slows down.
On the other side, if you design an economy so that inflation exists. People want to spend because in the future their money will be worth (a little bit) less.
Money flows around a lot. People who sells things make money and stay in business. People have jobs and the money is still worth something.
Remember money isn't worth something, trading good fluidly and efficiently is worth something. Money lets us do that. So a currency that lets us do that is good.
If anyone knows more about the situation, please add it. I don't know any economists so this story is probably pretty incomplete.
I have no inside information about Airbnb, but I'd guess they are slowing moving the money to try and prevent fraud on their system. Basically, A stolen card being used for a high value amount. Obviously that is annoying to anyone who is waiting for money, but I've seen it happen in many situations where money is transfered.
Are you a frequent hoster? If you have a lot of money coming in for your apartment, it is much more likely that it would be transfered quickly.
If you are a frequent hoster, is this a unusually large amount at once? Or is it from someone who is using Airbnb for the first time?
In the end, it sounds like your experience wasn't so great. But I'd hope you remember that it is just people on the other end answering your email and trying to prevent fraud. Many of those people answer hundreds of emails a day and probably make mistakes as often as anyone else. I hope everything works out for you.
I'm fond of speaking tersely.
If that doesn't work for you, this might:
history 1 | awk '{print $2}' | awk 'BEGIN {FS="|"}{print $1}' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | tail | sort -nr
What that doesn't give you is the command tree, for example "git commit" vs "git checkout". It just does "git".
[edit, added gem link] The gem is here https://github.com/paulmars/huffshell
Anything that increases conversions is great! Best of luck! I look forward to seeing it in the wild. In fact, are there any merchants in SF I can watch use it yet?