snicker7

What about SQS and Step Function integrations? I need to integrate this into my production workflows ASAP to meet my quarterly targets.

I usually just use the Julia REPL as my “shell” (my terminal emulator is configured to open it directly).

This is fine. My love life has had far, far longer outages.

Time is warped by gravity. Gravity is produced by matter with mass. The early universe had a higher mass-density resulting in this time-warping effect.

You can still utilize code spaces with other IDEs and text editors. It’s just a matter of SSHing into them.

You can’t use time command in this sort of benchmark. You are including start up t times here.

I had a good tech lead. They did occasional code reviews and made occasional contributions and did some PoCs. But most of that was delegated to the rest of us. He instead instead managed most of the communication with stakeholders and then product manager.

But have you considered the impact to /equity/ on the platform?

Have you considered using Pluto notebooks instead? They are designed to be reproducible (including version references to transitive dependencies). They are also reactive, so it is trivial to change the dataset.

AKA memes from r/AdviceAnimals

I really wish this sort of thing was automatic, transparent to the user, and built into the Julia runtime.

Languages and with some sort of decent metaprogramming support can alleviate this sort of issue (see Zig, Julia, Jai, etc.)

I wish Framework had more color options in their Marketplace (e.g gold, torquise, pink), especially considering how they advertise themselves as being modular / customizable.

The solution is obvious: journals should, as a matter of policy, refuse to publish non-reproducible studies. Reproducibility is the only thing separating science from mythology.

Julia is my favorite language by far. The biggest issue is the tooling.

- Promotes REPL driven development, but can’t even redefine types without restarting the session. - Language is very permissive (both by semantics and by convention). Very difficult to write correct code. Poor IDE experience. The shining light atm is - Poor support for abstractions. Julia’s abstract types are very limited. Best practice is to use traits (not even a language feature, but a tacked on convention), but afaict, there is no IDE support for this. - High latency due to compilation (Julia is an AoT language masquerading as a JITed language, eg V8 JavaScript). Julia 1.9 (beta) is first release I found tolerable latencies.

I do Java for my day job. That language is garbage in comparison to Julia. But the tooling makes it far more tolerable.

In retrospect, how essential was it that Julia went the dynamic route in the first place (as opposed to taking a Haskell-like approach to inferred static typing)?

Why not? Not all blogs need to be like news letters. My blog mostly contains my daily caloric intake.

There are several Muji stores in my city. I get high quality stationary on the cheap.

As described in the article, the political bias is intentional. It is the result of (not-so-transparent) ethical guard rails baked into the system.

I think they are asking for MacOS support (which Nix supports). Not possible with Guix except through a VM.

You can be socially engineered to open a mallacious excel.

Algorithms for Decision Making was just released in print. It uses Julia for its code examples.

I am not sure if the JS vs. C++ benchmark is really fair. Using unix "time" utility, you are also including the startup of the JS runtime.

Symphony, for compliance reasons.

“CTO of Azure not using Magit”

You don't have to be rich to invest in the stock market.

+ 1

Magit is an excellent and widely used Git TUI.

My understanding is that this was being worked on by Jan Vitek and his team as a research project. Not sure how much communication his team has with the Julia compiler devs.

The law asks for aggregated (mean/median/count) of hourly wage data for each (race, ethnicity, sex) triplet.