419 karma · joined September 11, 2012
I guess it should be https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-06-25/apple-to-...
mb related to choice supportive bias
I don't think the out loud or someone listening / reacting matters at all here. Suspect it's entirely this:
>The thought that was comfortable as a vague impression has to become a sentence, and sentences have structure.
I often construct full sentences in my head. And have conversations with my mental model of some other person. In full sentencesMany people swim as a form of exercise. Fly is exercising different muscles and allows me to get my heart rate up higher than freestyle
Fly is useful to train for other strokes
Perhaps more importantly, I think that having a different stroke to do makes swimming more interesting. Whether doing sets as part of a swim team or on your own, it's more interesting when you can vary things. The more swimming is interesting, the easier it is to enjoy and keep doing it
To be clear, I guess that a city who had ownership rights but not development rights could be stupid and ignore a conservation easement, but I guess that is not likely.
[1] https://github.com/3WyUFvDOdCbBw7gOZHwcfgKF
[2] IZ1zPtHyDX5b3s7iLYS2zRoz5 @ proton.me
mb see https://www.amazon.com/Lattice-Coding-Signals-Networks-Quant...
There are always constraints and limitations, including those to build and provide energy for software, and also the societal impacts. I guess the designer of Bitcoin and of current AI datacenters ignored constraints in the way described in the quote and the world is now paying the price in higher carbon emissions and energy prices
Milton Love, a marine biologist at the University of California’s Marine Science Institute in Santa Barbara, Calif., says the fish's muppet-like appearance demonstrates "the awesome power of natural selection." ... "Or, and here is another hypothesis, Gaia created this fish after having one too many of those rum drinks that come with those little umbrellas."
Nice :-)I meant "those who do NOT have capital ...
“Since 1860, federal taxation had increased sixfold, yet the tax burden was primarily borne by the poor. At the same time, corporate profits had increased tenfold, much of it untaxed. It cost rich Americans 8 to 10 percent of their earnings to finance the government, while the poor paid taxes equivalent to 75 to 80 percent of their savings.”
Sounds very much like today: those with capital (like me) are benefiting from a low tax rate, while those who do have capital and earn their income from labor pay a higher percentage of their income as taxes. I definitely see the debates of the progressive era as being about capital.[1] https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Great_Tax_Wars/kw-Q...
For a more recent example, listen to this podcast episode: https://www.acquired.fm/episodes/vanguard
* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATUxfN_lEVo
HT https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/05/casimir-force-co-opt...
The Tribune will still have advertising.
The Salt Lake Tribune (as in the article above) CAN afford salaries.
> If the people arent interested in paying... what else can you do?
People ARE paying. I'm a subscriber to the Tribune and a donor.
> ... The nitrogen emission and highly super-solar [N/C]>1 hint at an abundance pattern similar to local globular clusters that may have once hosted luminous supermassive stars. Since this abundance pattern is also common among the most ancient stars born in the Milky Way, we may be directly witnessing the formation of such stars in dense clusters, connecting galaxy evolution across the entire sweep of cosmic time.