In [1]: ord("β")
Out[1]: 946
In [2]: ord("ß")
Out[2]: 22393 karma · joined October 14, 2019
In [1]: ord("β")
Out[1]: 946
In [2]: ord("ß")
Out[2]: 223- "Starfish"
- "Maelstrom"
- "βehemoth"
What a nice attitude.
Currently I use Elasticsearch with the Open Distro approximate kNN plugin by the way.
All the major IDEs like sublime/jetbrains/vscode have both of these functionalities.
Right now there is now way to do that, because there is no consensus on how the state should be stored. That's a worse developer experience, compared with vim for instance.
Another story is that some people pointed out a missing feature - moving lines or blocks of text up and down, as more advanced IDEs do. I volunteered to implement this feature, however I'm getting impression that the community is a bit puristic when it comes to features like that, based on feedback I get.
One argument is that this feature will make the code too complex to maintain (write your own bindings if you want that). Another that have been brought up is that acting on selected lines, instead of characters violates the rule act-by-selection (that is, modify only selected characters in the buffer, similarly how visual mode in vim works).
I acknowledge these arguments, yet I got a feeling that the community is a bit too perfectionist.
About the interpretation, I myself understand only the:
/igi nu-mu-un-du[8]/ - "I don't see anything"
The rest is a bit above my level. But check this alternative interpretation of this joke: https://twitter.com/abbyfheld/status/1501880993833054208
[0] https://www.amazon.com/Learn-Read-Ancient-Sumerian-Introduct...
[1] To some extent you can see the same cuneiform symbols in later Akkadian texts, but forget about the grammar.
Lisp'y example is as usual pretty elegant.
[0] https://github.com/sireliah/dragit
* Note *: author here