shukantpal

If you're looking for an alternative, look at Teamflow https://www.teamflowhq.com − but it's a lot more! (Disclaimer: I work there)

webdoc is a documentation generator for JS / TS and now the sites it generates can be cached offline with the click of a button! I go through how I did it in this post.

You provide no points to refute my statement. Being bounded between 0% and 100% is irrelevant, unless you think only 100% efficient is not inefficient - which would be absurd due to the impossibility of obtaining an “efficient” label.

That question assumes the default state is they didn’t exist already

Lmao show the numbers then. Is the cost of printing 75% of the newspaper- probably not.

“Efficient” is a relative comparison. Any absolute threshold would be arbitrary anyway

False. The problem is so complex we have to resort to guessing / brute force to solve it; if it's so easy, give me a closed-form solution so I can become rich.

I’m wondering if for these extreme use cases a bare metal program that doesn’t sit on top of a OS / kernel would be substantially more efficient.

Not really safer

"There is no chargeback right however, which can be considered a disadvantage for the consumer using this payment method."

The question was philosophical not legal. You missed the point.

Are you including the cost of battery storage in solar & wind power generation for 24 / 7 power output? Otherwise Nuclear power is of higher quality since it can be sustained virtually at any time unlike solar & wind

>> Should auto-manufacturers be liable for emissions produced by cars that have had their catalytic converters stolen?

> This is an interesting hypothetical, but I don't see the relevance

That's your willing ignorance, and on the 2nd point too.

No. Backend itself has that same tooling (compiler / build toolchain) and even that isn’t infra.

The reason the latter is immoral is because common sense tells us no rational person would enter a contract to slavery under reasonable circumstances. That is not true for software.

> Nah. You're an (extreme) edge case.

False.

Cringe way to say 21st century

Yes and? Not a remotely fair comparison.

Why are you ignoring the regional differences & the other stuff listed above those points in that post?

The commies are here to give an actual argument, finally. Won't somebody listen to them?

I'm not a one off 786.

That's a foolish idea, happy to know it's from a one off.

That only makes sense if you pay double for using double the packets on another day

I guess to an outsider they don’t seem invasive. I didn’t realize they were invasive like surgeries

Approximately drop by 50% if existing rates are near zero. That's because a 10% yield will double your money when a 10y bond matures. So existing bonds have to halve to double your money in the same way.

No it wouldn’t be ridiculous because both the sender and receiver are customers here

False. If you have 100 features, there are nCr(100, 5) combinations of 5% features = 75287520.

It actually doesn't require you to charge more than you want.

It only requires you to charge IF you want to do something that requires you to (global popularity). Having music globally "available" has no cost, I suspect you are referring to globally popular music. And I think it makes sense for that cost to be beared by the artist since they are the one benefitting and desiring it anyway; no point in asking other people (record labels / travel industry) to do that service for free.

Tesla does not need to justify it's valuation. That's set by shareholders.

Probably because customers aren’t going to malls for a short trip and taking 5-10 mins extra to park isn’t a big deal compared to them going to a small shop for 5 mins and getting out of there.

It is compatible − capitalism doesn't require you to profit more than you want.