shrubby

That leads us to BJ Fogg's Persuasive Design Lab at Stanford and the addictive software design.

Tobacco industry owners figured out their time's out and bought food stock and put their addiction department to design food to be addictive.

Where should we head next?

Or search "nerd reich" or "tech fascism" here to see the instantly flagged topics.

It gets flagged here instantly so your duty to read this.

Try searching "tech fascism" or "nerd reich" and almost every topic is flagged.

Nerd Reich describes the Y Combinator connection nicely.

Highly recommend and can't see a bigger root cause for the current human predicament.

Not in aviation anymore, but luckily that practice seems to be forgotten now?

I did this on purpose this spring.

I had a shitty winter in terms of endurance and was pretty much starting from the gutter in February. Spring and early summer we're stressful so I did mostly Z1/LSD cycling in the form of extended commuting from work to home. Nothing excessive though as stress was plentiful.

The estimated fitness or the Garmin estimate didn't budge much.

Once vacation started I kept this on for few weeks to recover and after that added few harder sessions in a two week period. Few weeks after this I felt the change and Garmin also estimated 6 mil's of added VO2MAX in a week.

Don't care about the metrics, but the added QOL from this and now I hopefully have a structure for the coming winter not to lose as much of this as the previous.

Here's a nice summary. Haven't read the book yet though it's on my list.

Taxation will not solve this before the global society collapses so the question is whether we figure out a way to level the power.

This is not evil, but a trait of human nature of corruption or addiction to power.

There might be new and fancy UI or something, but I spend 99% of the time only flipping pages so the outdated UX is nothing compared to the privacy I get.

Ancient Basic Kindle works still nicely and so does 1st gen Paperwhite + the few Kobo's we have in the family.

So not the best metric for what majority of people want.

Also the wants are manufactured in many parts.

The century of the self must be recommended also.

I was just a while ago writing elsewhere (sorry, not totally on topic):

"But now almost everyone has figured out what the signs of the corruption are so we can spot the ones getting ill from the power and remove them.

I was joking that we (Finland) could sacrifice a island f Åland to be a Matrix for the power corrupted elite. We can simulate plenty of virtual sycophants fro them to be perfectly happy narcissists while isolated from doing us harm.

And I'm happy to volunteer to train as a therapist, should someone want to get better!

The golden rule and its formulations is pretty damn good litmus test for checking the level of corruption. If you're deep enough this will create a rage reaction. Think of Trump when someone talks about empathy or standard deviation. He will get hostile as he doesn't understand what the aliens around him are talking about.

I referred to the moral development with the lollipop and the levels are:

Pre-conventional (narcissist level in childhood or later in life regression by trauma, addiction or ...) Conventional (the sheep level that understands moral based on what others do around - google banality of evil if you don't know this) Post-conventional is the level where we do the golden rule thinking.

Most of us are in the conventional in action, BUT can understand the golden rule and that's enough. Have the decision makers reflect on some, even mundane, issues on the basis of "what if all 8 billion of us did this" and you'll get a short sircuit or division by zero, if the capability has regressed or never developed. These are no evil people by no means, but in most cases ones that have not had a healthy people around them. Either as a child or later on. We just know where we're going to end up should we not remove them from the power. Whether the society is powered by communism, or capitalism, or whateverism the outcome is the same if we don't figure out a way for this.

We cannot allow replacement via "good great leaders" as the power itself also creates the regression, just like addiction or trauma. So if I'm seemingly moral now and you'll select me as the great spagetti leader that dictates over the world and other puny religions, eventually I will corrupt by the admiration. And so will you.

The predicament of the human race is IMO decided by the fact that do we dare to start talking about this human trait honestly :D Sorry a long rant, now I'll shut up!"

So thanks for a question I had an answer almost available!

Aleksey Yurchak coined a term Hupernormalisation and it works here too.

We know the reality, yet leaders keep telling us via TV, social media... that everything is fine.

We know that they know that we know.

Fake world? Matrix? Escape from the freedom?

Not even grown ups have the capacity to resist the brainwashing capacity and the power asymmetry.