I wonder what fraction of the hardware goes into hosting the human operator and into ensuring their safety. How much hardware cam be optimized away when there is no longer a human operator?
304 karma · joined July 21, 2007
And an $80M round sounds sane these days
One thing to keep in mind with HTTP/2 server push is that a server can only send a push in response to a client request. So this isn't a drop-in "real-time push" mechanism. To implement the equivalent of real-time push would likely require client/server to keep a stream within the connection in the "open" state whereby the server can send continue to send data frames on that.
Don't mean to hijack the thread, but I've been toying with the idea of having users use a data flow diagram to structure complex spreadsheets. Still have a pre-prototype stage and I'ld love to get your expert feedback on that idea. If interested please drop me a note.
The transparency I speak about is slightly different. AirBnB where (I think) caught out when news broke of a landlord's home was vandalized. The company was heavily criticized for an arguably insufficiently transparent initial response.
Eventually, AirBnB were transparent in the sense that they acknowledged mistakes and acknowledged inherent risks to landlords. They used that transparency to improve the offering and promote the product accordingly. Kudos to Chesky and team!
At the risk of repeating myself, I see a parallel with Heroku's status dashboard. In a sense they are saying: "We won't mislead you. Hosting with us carries risk of downtime. Here is a dashboard so you see how well (or bad) we are doing." That too is an example of transparency leading to an improved service offering.
Heroku seem to have done it proactively. AirBnB did so reactively. Better late, of course, than never.
The article focuses on transparency between management and employees. Transparency with customers and with the public is at least equally interesting.
A company can benefit from transparency. Heroku, for example, are transparent with their downtime (e.g. status.heroku.com). Another example is the case of AirBnB and the EJ debacle. Once AirBnB openly acknowledged that safety/security is a concern for landlords it adapted by rolling out an improved product (guarantees, safety features, etc).
Both of these are great examples of transparency at the core impacting the product and how it is marketed. These products are more valuable and more competitive because of transparency. Certainly this adds to revenues and likely the bottom line as well.
AirBnB could have adopted this approach earlier. So, the lack of transparency can be missed opportunity.
In other words a text editor is one instance of an application that can use the underlying service. Think about that for a second. The concept of collaborative editing as a service that can be adapted to ANY application is HUGE. For example, an engineering CAD app would be more powerful with this feature.
Going further,if you consider that machines can also "collaborate" then it get's even more interesting. An example of human/machine collaboration could be a real-time reporting application.
"Twitter is important because it's a new protocol. Fundamentally it's a messaging protocol where you don't specify the recipients. It's really more of a discovery than an invention; that square was always there in the periodic table of protocols, but no one had quite hit it squarely."
Not sure about Oracle 10g though.
But it isn't quite that novel. Face-to-face interaction we have in the real world can be viewed as high-quality "video communications". Technology is merely making it affordable to do the same at a distance and without losing much of the quality.
So, most of the old etiquette simply migrates to the new medium. For example, if you don't go to work in pyjamas you probably won't take a video call at home while in your pyjamas either.
In general though, is it just me or are we yet to see an API/library/protocol that makes it 'simple' to add real time capabilities to an app?
He talks about social engineering as a form of security attack but much of the examples he may provide are relevant.
By the way, the landing page design looks great!
$cd engine
$git init .
$cd ../web-files
$git init .
This was posted earlier on HN http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1986867?
How about a script for a *NIX command line?
$ tidypub -t 'Any Title' < foo.txt
http://www.tidypub.org/wHzf3
$Have you evaluated causal trees against OT as the collaboration algorithm?
See:
bouillon.math.usu.ru/articles/ctre.pdf bouillon.math.usu.ru/articles/broth5.pdf
I would like to see a tool that would, first, allow real-time editing of structured documents. Think Etherpad meets Wufoo.
Take the example of a team writing an RFP to buy IT equipment. Team members from purchasing, the business unit and IT would need to collaborate on a document with likely a pre-defined structure (technical specs, functional specs, terms & conditions, deadlines, etc). This is different from the lack of structure in Google Wave or Etherpad. I imagine that the majority of knowledge work in today's enterprise is about filling in templates rather than free-flowing text.
For this to work, as a minimum we would need:-
1. real-time communication 2. the ability to design templates with the right balance between strictness & flexibility
Second, it should support a workflow. Sticking with this example, the purchasing manager should be able to publish the RFP and invite vendors to respond. The bid manager at the vendors should then be able to turn (transform) an RFP into a bid template, invite his/her sales team to collaborate on a bid and so on.
Not sure how this would work, but perhaps the following:-
1. Access control 2. A way to transforming one document with a certain structure to another.
I would imagine the right to pressing button or having your button pressed will be institutionalized,e.g. through a Church or Government. Doing that freely and often - before some sort of permission, license or ceremony - would be stigmatized and possibly outlawed.