5,566 karma · joined June 9, 2019
Open to new roles: hn@sjer.red
I use CC and Codex about equally. CC by far has the best harness but I prefer OAI's models.
- CC is pretty effortless in sleeping, monitoring, or waiting. If I ask CC to get CI green, it will correctly wait for the GitHub status check to resolve, check BuildKite logs, and iterate. Codex will usually just do one cycle usually because it gets confused on how to wait. I think Claude Code has a built in 'monitor' primitive which might help.
- With CC I can easily say here's a huge piece of work that will likely be 100k-200k LOC. Divide up the work and have cheaper models do the impl. CC will _usually_ do this right. With Codex it almost never works well for me. I have been able to get GPT 6 Astra to do this more successfully.
Pro 100: 5x usage, $100
Pro 200: 10x usage, $200 (previously was 20x usage, $200)
Pro 500: 25x usage, $500
So, essentially scaling is equal. You get the same amount of usage from 25 ChatGPT Pro accounts as you do from one Pro 500 account.
It's fair, but a big of a rug pull considering how good of a deal Pro 200 was.
Though, as you can see, I didn't really polish it
It's a bit funny that the projects are also very similar in goals
Even putting that aside, economic growth (like the growth e-commerce has provided) is generally positive for a population
Everyone said tokens were too expensive but these are getting close to free while still having fantastic performance.
Even just consider banks and e-commerce. They are hugely lucrative and making them even a tiny bit less accessible directly impacts their revenue. As an example, Amazon seeing that latency has a measurable effect on purchase behavior.
Maybe the military (fictional or otherwise) can go back to the ARPANET but most economic activity created by the internet cannot afford to disconnect
(setting aside when civilians are purposefully harmed which is a conversation about morals rather than the capability to make correct decisions)
What I am getting at is, has AI really made the problem worse or has the mechanism just changed?
The calculus has certainly changed. Hacking is becoming even more frequent and… I’m not really sure what the equilibrium looks like.
It’s not really an option to stop using computers or networks. But it’s going to be way too expensive (or maybe even impossible) to secure even just critical systems.
Maybe banks and governments can secure themselves (and that’s a big IF) but it really feels like something fundamentally has to change.
Astra is truly amazing for computer-use or any interactive tasks
I find these subscriptions so essential to using LLMs for personal projects -- it would be prohibitively expensive otherwise
Codex, especially with Luna is an excellent deal. I think it's significantly more economical than Claude Code. The only reason to stay with CC at this point is access to Fable for _very_ hard problems.
I can understand this take 4-5 years ago but I have no idea how that's your position in 2026
Did Amazon make such a promise? They didn't as far as I know. My understanding is they provide specific guarantees like given an AZ outage, your data is still safe (provided you architect correctly).
I had this same thought recently. Is it possible to 'recreate' ChatGPT/Claude Chat easily in Codex or Claude Code? I assume it would roughly be just swapping the system prompt. Anthropic seems to publish theirs but I don't think OpenAI does
https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/release-notes/system-pro...
I'm not going to complain to DoorDash if my order is delayed due to a car crash
I don't really know what the right response is, though. Walking out would be seen as way too hostile
PERSON 1 Have you heard of Kagi? It’s like Google, but better, and... oh... you have to pay for it.
PERSON 2 Why would I pay for something when I can use Google for free? I use Adblock anyway.