Anthropic is cutting Claude Code's current weekly limits by 17%
bleepingcomputer.com
bleepingcomputer.com
I find these subscriptions so essential to using LLMs for personal projects -- it would be prohibitively expensive otherwise
Codex, especially with Luna is an excellent deal. I think it's significantly more economical than Claude Code. The only reason to stay with CC at this point is access to Fable for _very_ hard problems.
For non-coding LLM use cases ChatGPT is what I subscribe to now after I cancelled my Claude subscription because it found tge responses verbose, condescending.
I have no loyalty, they all need to compete on quality and price and as a potential customer I think I’m benefiting.
Astra is truly amazing for computer-use or any interactive tasks
First it was "search agents" consuming the limits.
Secondly, then it was "reasoning tokens" doing that.
Third, it was "planning" mode for long horizon tasks.
Forth, adding "/goal mode" + 1M context for auto non-stop token consumption.
Fifth, "sub-agents" in parallel doing all of the above.
Then, Anthropic told us to use "loops" instead of prompting.
Recently "auto mode" was switched on by default, with sub-agents used by default on Fable.
Now, Anthropic is slowly reducing your limits in their closed-source harness.
I really think Anthropic deserves much shit, but that's just shitting on the for the wrong reasons. And I hate that I am defending them here.