Thank you, for an awesome, relatively ingenious idea to preserve the history and highlight its significance in a human history, the love for discoveries and cooperation...
I love it...
42 karma · joined October 31, 2024
Thank you, for an awesome, relatively ingenious idea to preserve the history and highlight its significance in a human history, the love for discoveries and cooperation...
I love it...
It's sad you negate all my other effort, and fixate on these few comments where I share my stand for my beliefs for human work, experience, effort, and love... And it's also sorrowful you list just a few references to my messages in your negative accent, here for everyone to shame on whatever you believe yourself. You should list my other contributions and comments (which you just ignored and dimmed) to judge my presence and history fair, human, and responsibly.
If I see an effort, I support: https://codeberg.org/Brachylophus/Apoidea/pulls/29#issuecomm...
Slop? Never, and I would rather die. Meanwhile, I just so heartfelt hope the agent-circled person will re-consider their time and life, and listens to the screams and sorrow inside the datasets of these LLMs which are built on stolen by vendors (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, High-Flyer, Mistral, Cohere, Google etc.) effort and art of now unknown/defaced artists and developers...
If you have problems with me, I ask you to discuss this in private. Otherwise, your attitude does not seem professional or accountable.
I appreciate you heartfelt... for your marvelous effort, time, and love... you've already invested into the platform. Yet, it's obvious that the platform has changed. It's sorrowful to know Hacker News became this utter mess, where also initially trusted people derail conversations and threaten members on public, and for this? Thankfully, there are other venues, including public even as Lobsters (previous Barnacles), IndieHackers, DailyDev, DevTo, Tildes, HackerOne, or fediverse-like Lemmy/PieFed instances even.
That is, your statement has no sense. If you believe it is, please report it. Oh, please put your public defamation and devaluation of someone's commentary together, considering it the same "personal attack" towards me.
If you are so afraid of receiving messages that address your name, please reconsider your presence on the Internet.
If you will invest your time and effort addressing me on my projects published, where I assume responsibility and my authorship of them, being accountable for the works I publish on public.
That is, it is a work of someone who published online, and that is a responsibility to be taken, hence licenses exist, and your name on it. You are free to be "personal" on my work, too. Please do! I would appreciate it, if that would help us discover more and educate ourselves on subjects involved.
One of my GitHub accounts: https://github.com/serious-angel
\- amiunique.org/fingerprint;
\- coveryourtracks.eff.org;
\- pixelscan.net/fingerprint-check;
\- browserleaks.com;
\- ipleak.net;
\- demo.fingerprint.com/playground;
\- whoer.net;
\- 2ip.io/privacy;
\- ...
Why do even re-implement the wheel... negating the effort of actual people? Welp, you may live now knowing you've paid to use/mock stolen knowledge and art of now unknown actual developers/artists/people inside these srrowful LLMs, and possibly learned close to nothing prone to forget everything in a few months or weeks...- https://github.com/Sessa93/remote-df/commit/15bae297e5cad187...
Let's hope they wrote it manually, or at least re-verified the possibly re-generated "simplified" version...
json='{ "left":2, "right":2 }';
result="$(
perl -e '($_)=<>; / "left":(\d+), "right":(\d+)/; print $1 + $2, "\n";' <<< "$json";
)";
printf '%s\n' "$result";
Yet, it is literally the same as: printf '%s\n' "$(( 2 + 2 ))";I've been a travelling developer at military for security services for more than two decades now, and there's not a single soul out there I know in person who would expect or claim that any documentation is not for people but machines exclusively or initially even.
A documentation, whether formatted/standardized/conventional or not, is for a human, and always will be, because this is what you leave in the history of your own work of life.
> You can add a README file to your repository to tell other __people__ why your project is useful, what they can do with your project, and how they can use it.
>
> Source: https://github.com/github/docs/blob/9af628699ba0d381fb04929a6384c70d63cef8b9/content/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-readmes.md But... why.... from all possible protocols and options out there for secure, and less complex channels out there... they chose the so featureful and pure overhead as SSH...
For low-latency VNC+Audio, why not WireGuard, WebRTC, QUIC etc.?
Yes, Dungeon Crawl Stone Soup approached it relatively similarly for WebTiles, yet... it's infinitely different magnificent titles...
Oh... it's not them... it's Claude they used... or? Who knows, right? No one, including the priceless invaluable ideas of actual developers meat-ground into the Claude datasets now being sold for tokens...
// https://i.imgur.com/FM4aTMZ.png - SSH
// https://i.imgur.com/9lZniqE.png - Claude > Al Ries asserted that a brand is a singular idea or concept that you own inside the mind of a prospect.
>
> Source: https://heidicohen.com/what-is-branding [2011-08-15]
The keyword - mind. That is, a human being is supposed to stand behind a "brand", who is responsible for it, and is to be trusted for the product, the effort, the experience they offer.Yes, it's been accused by Microsoft, and yes it has been having issues since then, including the unstable uptime, but... it's still the awesome GitHub... with an ineffably magnificent history to care for I believe...
What if schools would provide children such marvel? Yes, that requires a sufficient time to achieve, but dear... it's just... a miracle...
Related: https://ciechanow.ski/archives (Bartosz Ciechanowski...)
The code was written by Claude, unfortunately, and hence no controls were probably even considered, or no tokens were left.
I jumped in with the love in mind, too, but when I checked the source repository, and saw the actual source... and then the contributors... it was... I am sorry... it hit hard... Just to clarify, what link is it?
I've check it out, and the GitHub icon, in the header on the top right corner, is correct, and links to the following project:
- https://github.com/royalbhati/sqltoerdiagramTo clarify, are you the author of the animations, or is it anyone/anything else as LLM, as the Claude used?
It seems like some look like of artists' Elliot Sutton (imskyleen at GitHub) and/or and dmytro (pqoqubbw at GitHub).
Oh... and the animation ease effect of rating items is also of dmytro's, isn'it it? It may be seen at:
- https://lucide-animated.com/
In this case, what is the main reason of your/LLMs project, if I may ask? What does it provide the aforementioned don't?
// ----- Edit (+20m)
I see, your project is a port to Vue you started:
- https://github.com/imskyleen/animate-ui/discussions/178
Relatively similar to projects as RadixVue, ShadcnVue, and the following:
- https://github.com/iloomilo/itshover-vue
Just in case, the aforementioned `icones.js.com` is not "new", but a project of Vue Community, initiated by Anthony Fu (antfu at GitHub), who is a member of the Vue core Team.
Regardless, though I don't appreciate use of LLMs (and presenting its output as personal work/effort), I appreciate you heartfelt for the added support for the ineffably marvelous Vue!
The droplet is what I found unexpected, too, indeed. Yet, the overall ideas, including the reverse animations on rotating ones, with some funky ease, is purely genius, I believe...
If the actual animations/work are of hand of the Tim Rietz, the developer signed alongside Claude LLM, the they are a great artist!
Related: https://icones.js.org/
It seems like the inspiration went from Audacity, and with great changes to the design and feel of calmness and solidity!
I've tried loading a file with XM format, yet the current state of the import logic stated "Unsupported". Is there any chance you'll support the format?
For example, the following artwork is radiating charmingly in VLC:
- https://cable.ayra.ch/modplayer/mods/!Others/DYNAMITE_-_Winamp_5.0RC8_crk.xm
And, thank you! very much for the experiments, effort, miracles... art you do...And it is (300,755++ lines from Claude): https://github.com/CraigVG/roman-letters-network
Here, I am sorry, but I just cannot consider it serious nor accountable, since I just cannot trust its data.
If all the information there is valid and verified, every single letter and the authors' word after the LLM's processing, then the "AI" may be dimmed.
Yet, I don't believe so, knowing how unlimitedly every subjective word may change contexts, and using objectified and limited LLM for it?
There's `?scholarly=true` GET parameter mentioned in the `:/CLAUDE.md`, but a quick check of its behavior didn't result in any change.
Regardless, the idea and overall intention that highlights the impact and importance of history, and presents connections between infinitely unique and miraculous people around the infinite world... where every single word carries a life moment... is ineffably magnificent...
Thank you, Craig Vander Galien, for the idea and love in history!
---
> Modern English translations were produced using Claude (Anthropic), working from either the Latin/Greek original or an existing 19th-century English version. Translation work was guided by two internal documents: a translation guide covering late antique epistolary conventions, rhetorical register, and how to handle common formulaic phrases; and a modern voice guide specifying tone, vocabulary level, and how to avoid archaism while remaining faithful to the original.
>
> AI-generated translations are clearly marked in the interface. They are provided for accessibility and research convenience, not as authoritative scholarly translations. The original Latin or Greek is preserved alongside every translation, and 19th-century English versions are shown where available. Corrections from domain experts are welcome.
>
> Source: https://romanletters.org/about/It's easier to attack a solution with its source code available, and with an LLM trained on existing vulnerabilities found, and some datacenters/funding available, et voila, you have a system set to reveal flaws in already awesome projects, to be fixed.
This is normal. You just need power, and time. And there must be more found but left undisclosed, for better times, strategic 0days etc.
Who has such power, and funding? Is it possible Linux competitors do pay enthusiasts to attack, reveal, and damage reputation? What if someone who has funding and time, would try attacking their closed source code instead? Regardless, I wish them safety and peace, too.
And not to mention, a yet again, politics agitation...
That said, how much human was involved into this project, if I may ask?
I do not want to disrespect anyone, but I just want to trust your project, and to do so I must know how much there is yours of your own mind you trust yourself.
Art... love still exists! Thank you, dear sanjit, Carolina Moscoso, and Julian Lucas at NewYorker for the ineffably magnificent art... miracles you do...
If no AI was in use for its creation process, I do so wholeheartedly hope, then every single folder features ideas/message in quite genius attitudes, I believe, and the whole work deserves a physical frame!
Related:
- 1. https://symfony.com/doc/current/reference/configuration/framework.html#configuration-framework-secret
- 2. https://laravel.com/docs/13.x/encryption#gracefully-rotating-encryption-keysPerhaps some movement is needed? I do recall some relatively similar cases saved, if interested:
1. Moving forward in space (JavaScript/JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/zYEdxyo
2. Rotating in space (JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/NWMRYJP
3. Rotating in space (CSS+JS): https://codepen.io/the_artwork/pen/PoeNyyy