serious_angel

This is so dear sorrowful...

Art is a conversation between two people, that is a timeless communication between human.

An artwork to realize... to surf within to learn from, to listen to, to realize someone's images, someone's ideas, someone's worries, someone's messages... someone...

Art is someone's work of life, their experience, their... love...

There's human time in art... in a book, article, painting, soundscape, film, video-game... there's alive time of other human who reified their life experience, views, ideas... in an artwork and passed it to the outer world... to be inscribed in the infinitely magnificent history...

This...? This is just, sorry, deadly awful, dreadful, dark, and dear pain in heart... This is also disrespectful towards the Artists, Developers, people who worked on the Universe and this exact artwork...

This is utterly sorrowful...

These ML/LLM/AI are systems where no one will ever be accountable for and guarantee its stability, safety, and its value.

ML/LLM/AI may be useful, but it must always be considered unauthorized, mistrust, experimental, unverified, always probable to fail on each iteration. Its data must always be accountably supervized by an alive human, who realizes responsibility, life, pain, art, effort, love... Always, even at 2999+ years/times. No life/pain/art/love is no sense/trust/confidence/respect/safety.

That is, it may be fun to play with as a toy, as any ML/LLM/AI based system, where no trust exist but only probability, entropy, chance, luck... but nothing serious, time-rewarding, or humane enough to appreciate and love it in the long run.

An actual Developer is someone who prioritizes thinking and solution finding relying on something deterministic and accountable.

All systems based on LLM, ML, or anything that is algorithmically based on feedback system, learning, training, is indeterministic, and hence, always inaccurate, unreliable, and irresponsible systems, by design.

The process of art-working, coding, programming, development, solution finding... that feel of an achievement. This is what I understand, too. There's no achievement in anything AI-driven - it based on luck/moment/probability/chance.

"Oh My God! Please, all Gods, make this AI output the finally correct code! Please!"

Fudge it.

And you also pay for it. You pay and depend on it, on the the luck, for the chance, for the probability someone controls for you over an API or algorithm you don't even know or cannot verify due its "self-training" design, or it being close-sourced.

> ...you're gatekeeping programming... you are not seeing the big picture... you are missing opportunities...

No, sorry, never. I do not agree with that. These "responses" are coming from infants, immature, children, I believe, sorry... from those who could not care less about the development, responsibility, the overall process of the life of us, people, to find solutions, to reach the goals, to treasure achievements, to write our history with actual names of people on papers sign on papers by hand... for what will leave after us, with art, statues, quotes... in the infinite history of the ineffably magnificent world...

Your name should be in the code you write alone or with a team, your commits, solutions. Your work must be acknowledged and kept in the history. You should be always a respectable alive artist, who is responsible for their work. Our history must evolve, be preserved, respected, appreciated, and shine with glory of our achievements with human names in it for the incredibly marvelous future of opportunities, discoveries, love, and purely magnificent marvel.

There's whole space out there, still, and we must add and keep human names in the history cherished.

> Machines should work. People should think. ~ IBM

Now that's a rare GitHub Username!

Though, again, a yet another project for a yet another "AI" to make someone else more dependent on it...

Related:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jev_(AI_model)  
    https://typesafe.ai/

The author mentioned Forgejo, but why don't mention Gitea that is the direct fork of Forgejo without which the former would not even exist?

Why skip such a marvelous project that is still modern and inherits a marvelous amount of human time and work within?

Perhaps like you, I did contribute pull-requests/issues to the Gitea project, and know people who did, too. Why do you mention a fork that changed the license and added possibly just a few if compared to the initial base repository of the Gitea and its Action Runner based on nektos/act they mentioned in their own fork even, too?

Is this how they dim so recent history, but why?

Thank you. I do not believe the author has any idea what he is talking about, too. It's worth to also mention some basics:

    1. Dependency on some outsourced LLM vendors (no Internet? No API response? Welp, you do you.);
    2. Undefined amount of payments/paid subscriptions at vendors;
    3. Undefined amount of tokens burnt on each prompt/iteration within undisclosed algorithms;
    4. Absolutely no responsibility/copyright for the LLM output;
    5. Privacy concerns on inside/company project source code uploaded;
    6. Incremental eventual atrophy of developer's own skills;
    7. Inhuman attitude for art, development, effort, purpose in general, since the models are built on stolen effort of other, now unknown, people...

Does the contributor of Canonical mentioned consider the fair difference between the absence of any telemetry on actual Linux desktop people just opt-out initially, and the forced/hidden telemetry on Windows?

How is that even possible to compare these numbers and state anything aloud like this, if we have literally no idea how many genuine Ubuntu setups are there with absolutely no Microsoft involved?

Sorry, but I believe the blog post author's statements regarding "statistics" are not fair, inaccurate, and simply invalid.

The "AI" part is a literal nonsense, bigotry, and just awful, too. The author should rather check the following stance, and reconsider his history and life decisions, I believe:

    > AI drive-by issues, pull requests and security reports are overwhelming maintainers. Rising security expectations (thanks Mythos) require maintainers to do even more work. Open source funding is hard to secure and insufficient.
    > 
    > Some of this is happening, but I’m sure as hell not seeing it in Homebrew...
    > 
    > As I’ve written before, the scarcest resource in open source is not money but the motivation of the maintainers.
    > 
    > # Fun Is Social
    > 
    > My first real experience of OSS was with a successful, established project whose culture I could observe. It was KDE, the community behind a desktop environment for Linux...
    >  
    > Firstly, this was weird because, if you read the discourse online, you were typically in the camp of “KDE SUCKS, GNOME ROCKS” or “GNOME SUCKS, KDE ROCKS”. And yet: you had both groups working together. Not just working together but eating, drinking, socialising and building new friendships...
    > 
    > Source: https://mikemcquaid.com/open-source-must-be-fun-or-it-will-die
  

---

P.S. When I published the identical comment in the blog post comment section, via their Disqus feature below, their moderator just deleted my message, too, at ~1830 UTC.

[flagged]

    > Our goal isn't to increase the volume of AI-made assets on the marketplace. It's to give designers better tools to work faster and focus more of their time on creative work.
    > 
    > Source: https://www.404media.co/ai-generated-3d-models-flood-market-but-almost-no-one-is-buying-them

This is not art. I do not and never will believe "AI" supports the creativity mentioned. More to that, I believe only not artists would say that nonsense. Or, sorry, a dear idiot even, who could not care less about art, human, the future at all.

Do you even realize how ineffably much an artist may imagine, consider, realize, choose while actually creating? It may be weeks, months, years... when artists developers, creates, enchants their unique miraculous creation... making it invaluable... an actual art...

These human experienced choices are immeasurably important where no "AI" should ever exist... The effortful lovely choices, where every single choice polishes an artwork... reifying it into a perfect or an imperfectly perfect miracle...

Thank you. Good point, but I did not mention anything about "auditing" but: "developing", "accountability", "art", and "mind".

There's no "religion" nor "subjectivity" here, and I have no issues with any developer who uses LLM for reviewing and auditing if they have no time or don't know anyone nor participate in Communities who will support a project in the subjects required.

If you still develop with your mind, accoutnability, creativity, and effort towards actually learning, getting valuable experience, and always prioritize a human, art, and effort, you should better know when use an LLM and when not, considering an undefined magnitude of marvelous knowledge, people, and experience you will definitely miss meanwhile, possibly remembering nothing and have no idea what you're doing at all alongside the non-accountable and prone to nonsense algorithm as LLM.

For example, if you do not consider the meat-ground miracles and artworks inside a yet another "free"/sold LLM dataset of now defaced/unknown artists, developers, engineers mentioned, people (like you and me), then if you prompt for a case to audit, require all sources to the evidence/suggestions found, carefully read the output, and manually approach it making notes to learn from and base your future on, it still may be considered an accountable development process.

What 's worth to mention is that no sorrowful effortless awful LLM/"AI" use is seen to be used, from the first glance, thankfully...

- https://github.com/MikeLuu99/searxng-rust/graphs/contributor... (as of 2026-08-03)

Though without actually checking out the source code, I believe it initially suggests respect, trust, and heartfelt gratitude towards the author, their experience, and the attitude the author bases on their miracle to be inscribed in the infinite history we all participate in...

Thank you, dear MikeLuu99, for you actually developing, being an actual developer, and the art... you do...

I wish you safety, prosperity, stability... and to your project to be acknowledged, receive enough attention, and to successfully set itself as a miracle to cherish...

    > The AIs will exceed humans in taste and intuition...  
    > The AIs will be better teachers than the humans. In any case, there won’t be a human audience for expository work of frontier math.  
    > No human needs to understand any of it...

Absolute nonsense. I am sorry, but... is it appropriate to not consider the author sick or having some mental disorder?

It seems like the person has no idea what they are talking about, or just too sarcastic to the point of idiotism.

    > Many early modems were acoustic couplers attached to telephone handsets using Velcro — one part was a microphone, the other a speaker. You connected by dialling the phone...
    > 
    > Tools like the Unix-to-Unix Copy Program (UUCP) used scripts that called cu or similar tools to establish connections, then transferred data...
    > 
    > UUCP was how we sent mail, read network news, and received (small) files. For much of the research community, it effectively was the network...
    >
    > Sockets changed all this.
    > 
    > Source: https://blog.apnic.net/2026/07/28/hooray-for-the-sockets-interface

So much has changed... yet so much has not... All are pure marvels and based on dear miracles...

    > With ePaper, the photo on screen stays there even after powering off.  
    > The only way to clear the screen is to take a new photo.
    > 
    > Source: https://reframe.camera 

Thank you... dear developers, artists, people... for the marvel, art you do...

The website does not list all the comments but just around ~50 without any way to load all the ~+1100 more (1132, as of 2026-07-28 2100 UTC).

The number of em-dashes is questionable, existing in many, if not all, the comments.

    > ...AI may end up progressing far more quickly than societies and states can adapt... ~ Stephanie Chan, Google  

I am sorry, but I am not sure whether it's adequate and fair to allow join such statements/petitions to only those who live in it. Isn't it like allow deciding the future for weaponry laws to weapon and war enthusiasts only?

And, this is not serious at this point:

    > ... ~ Source: Anonymous, Meta
    > ... ~ Source: Anonymous, Google

> Do you think we will become more and more tolerant?

I do not, sorry. This question feels quite odd to see, too, frankly. I became intolerant in ~20 years just "because", and only when I checked at medics for non-related general tests, and out of the blue it showed on the results paper. And And this is when I never had any abnormal meals with it, but just casually and normally as any other one, I believe. It was like a blow to the gut...

This intolerance changes the life much. It makes impossible to have any meals with other people in group or be afraid of trying anything that may have any kind of milk in it, and you may imagine that there's so much of it out there... including many kinds of common bread, cakes, candies, certain cheese, coffee as Latte, Cappuccino etc. The aftereffect depends on the person, and some have diarrhea-type issues, but in the case here, it only the stomach that hurts so much as if someone cuts it inside-out. There are tablets, but... it's always dear scary and it doesn't help much...

Currently, I am ~1.75m and ~63kg in ~40 years old woman, and I see more of this intolerance become normalized in European and Asian countries where some stores sell lactose-free holy milk and some cafes offer a so much appreciated lactoze-free lovely coffee...

The choice for the illustration is marvelous, no words... I love it...

Thank you for mentioning the Artists of so ineffably magnificent works:

- https://luisajung.com/

    > The announcement blog post, however, reads very poorly, and the section titled “The development team of none” is the worst of it. It states:

    > > Using LLMs to work with your code gives you a kick of adrenaline. You can develop at a rapid pace, build things as if you had a large team. Only that you have none. In fact, you are (often) alone, working with a statistical machine that turns energy into code.

---

This naive "rapid pace"...

Those who do in that careless "pace" will invest more time maintaining it, fixing it, supporting it, or well... realizing it, I believe.

Not to mention that they make themselves more and more dependent on some LLM vendor prospering these vendors with each iteration and tokens burned, and training their models on your own ideas, creativity, and your time of life. Yet, not a single person will guarantee a stable outcome, and no one to blame after. Is that "development"? That is dark horrific sorrow.

This "vibe coding" may be quick at starters, if lucky and all Gods and the Fortune got you, yet supporting that and investing your life time after?

No, never. I have my own mind to train. The people I work with have their own minds. The Communities out there have their own minds. We all have our mind to develop, and learn from each other. Otherwise, it’s empty, pointless, and not art you will be proud of as a developer who inscribes moments in the history, and stand your name in it.

Roger that! I'll look forward for an update, and hope to catch the moment and learn from it!

Meanwhile, I do wish you, and the whole team, success, stability, and peace!

Roger that! Thank you for the reference to the Artist!

Thank you very much! This is great read! Though, no actual steps mentioned, including the:

> From this, he ascertained that the exception was triggered by a call to the C function memmove. While the source and destination addresses for this call looked sane, the size field was set to...

I do get the most of these stated, but it would be awesome to know more about how he did actually find it, and with what toolset. Was is gdb, Valgrind, JetBrains, IDA Pro, or some another general/complex dump viewer/toolset?

And, the interactive miracle, at the top of the website is freaking marvelous... It reminded me of the articles of the fluid simulation algorithms of Yusuke Endoh! Heartfelt gratitude to the developer, the artist who implemented it!

Apparently, behind the scene, the fluid colors are contained in an array where every single color has a defined meaning!

     // categories in STACK order: index 0 at the floor → 4 at the surface
     const CATS = [
       { key: "Code", rgb: [133, 232, 157] },
       { key: "Craft", rgb: [179, 146, 240] },
       { key: "Lessons", rgb: [249, 117, 131] },
       { key: "Story", rgb: [255, 171, 112] },
       { key: "Opinion", rgb: [158, 203, 255] },
     ];

Thank you for the share/post, but I will never these use these void-bloody dark deafening noise of sorrow as LLM/"AI"-generated, sloppery slop... that is based on stolen actual effort and love of now defaced, unknown artists, people, who believed in their art, their message... and now sold and even further damaged each fraction of a second by LLM vendors/enthusiasts, as you, that service...

Not only that, but you, that service, will definitely use the photos, the input/data sent you, to train these sorrowful models though unknown and undisclosed algorithms even deeper and further, spreading bits of someones' lives and effort neglecting privacy and copyright as these do not exist and never existed... inhumanly.

No. Never. I believe in human work, that has a value to cherish, and learn from.

You? You do you.

The Community behind the marvelous project as ArchLinux32, are ineffably awesome... The project provide various options, including i496, i696, and pentium4 architectures with or without PAE requirements. The OS comes with pre-configured systemd, and supports numerous up-to-date repositories out-of-the-box. Some relatively lightweight custom window manager like Awesome or i3wm may also shape the environment if X required.

Apparently, I do still have a few photos in backups of someone's own enchanted marvel of a portal to universes powered by a Celeron D, USB pen-drive of 16 GiB, a single RAM of 1 GiB, we all managed to acquire and built, for such a short time we had!

Preview of the device: https://imgur.com/gallery/h1tWKp3

Since the CPU had no physical address extension (PAE) to electrify a more common OS, and something customary was required for the limited resources, where we chose ArchLinux 32-bit (now ArchLinux32, indeed) and arranged a custom AwesomeWM environment visually suggesting a console design just for it!

And dear... we adventured a few nights back then backed by this machine and some self-compiled emulation software, ZSnes and Gens, for the titles she had collected from a few local stores and magazines!

It was quite long ago... more than a decade and half... but it like all happened just yesterday, and how freaking awesome it was!

You likely had a similar event/memory! Please do remember these...

Related: https://www.archlinux32.org/architecture/ (The below table lists the compatibility of CPUs (identified by their available flags) with architectures...)

Thank you, heartfelt... for sharing an artwork, a miracle!

Just in case, have you considered publishing the work at platforms as CodePen, where genius Artists/People express their art, too, as you?:

// https://codepen.io/about

Thank you, but I won't even consider a yet another AI/LLM slop which will not be maintained in a few months, nor anyone will ever invest their life time into, too.

> Hey everyone, I wrote this tool...

Hey there. And yes, I don't you believe it's you who "wrote" it (where even the Readme file seems to be generated), nor you have experience enough in the so crucial subjects raised, to invest my own life time in the project, too, sorry.

I'll better consider projects where actual effort and human was involved believing in their art, knowledge, and experience of life they express in their actual, authentic, and accountable work.

Thank you, but... why not just write in Bash, or the shell you prefer? Why learn a yet another opinionated wrapper?

Yes, Bash or any shell is a very complex and utterly environment dependent language to approach with all due care for security and compatibility, yet hence the lack of wrapper that may not even be aware of these crucial cases at all.

It does not seem the technologies in use utilize anything actually serious for the verification, yet some devices are in design for the following, in also public patents:

    > Some disclosed embodiments involve determining an emotional state of an individual associated with the facial skin micromovements, and extracting meaning from the at least one subvocalized phoneme and the determined emotional state. The term “emotional state” refers to an individual's emotional condition and may be used as an indicator of the individual's behavior, cognition, and overall well-being...
    > 
    > As another example, the additional data may include the individual making a vocal statement that is different from a statement associated with their subvocal facial skin micromovements. Using such a vocal statement in the authentication is desirable to indicate that the user does not intend to make that statement at that time, such as in situations of duress like being threatened to say that statement...
    > 
    > The event may have an asymmetrical impact on the subject. In such cases, a sensing device may be used for monitoring/detecting muscle micromovements on both sides of the face and comparing said muscle micromovements. The comparison and differences between the facial muscle micromovements of each side of the face may be used to determine the extent of damage, as well as monitor deterioration or improvement in the subject's condition. As a difference in facial muscle micromovements may be determined and may be above a certain threshold, an indication of an illness/condition or episode may be generated. 
    > 
    > Source: <https://patents.google.com/patent/US20250173415A1/en>

The first message read when opened and invested my life time into a yet another sorrowful effortless slop:

    Error in user YAML: (<unknown>): mapping values are not allowed in this context at line 1 column 32

File: https://github.com/nmxmxh/foundation/blob/58507557eb93ade287...

Preview: https://i.imgur.com/i8KBXjY.png

Ineffably magnificent...

I love it... Though I am not into the football much or at all, such profile custom generators are always miraculous... They highlight how magnificent, important, and significant the history is... and that every single live you wrote, you thought about and materialized, the actual effort, work, and love of people... for support, contribution, creation, discovery... will always be acknowledged eventually in respectful, wonderful, beautiful manner...

Thank you... heartfelt... dear authors, developers, Artists, People... for the miracles you do...

I so much hope... the website itself is not AI/LLM-coded... or is a slop... otherwise, everything above is not about it, and never will be. I hope so much it's not... please...

Awesome! It is indeed a marvelous merchandize concept! An effortful work of ingenious ideas and great history... sealed in a iridescent CD and signed by a supportive holder of it on public...

Thank you, for an awesome, relatively ingenious idea to preserve the history and highlight its significance in a human history, the love for discoveries and cooperation...

I love it...

I have no idea why you support slop and hate on people effort, including me trying to highlight a thing being a slop where no people actually worked on their project but just paid for a few tokens, wrote a prompt, and published the model output.

It's sad you negate all my other effort, and fixate on these few comments where I share my stand for my beliefs for human work, experience, effort, and love... And it's also sorrowful you list just a few references to my messages in your negative accent, here for everyone to shame on whatever you believe yourself. You should list my other contributions and comments (which you just ignored and dimmed) to judge my presence and history fair, human, and responsibly.

If I see an effort, I support: https://codeberg.org/Brachylophus/Apoidea/pulls/29#issuecomm...

Slop? Never, and I would rather die. Meanwhile, I just so heartfelt hope the agent-circled person will re-consider their time and life, and listens to the screams and sorrow inside the datasets of these LLMs which are built on stolen by vendors (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, High-Flyer, Mistral, Cohere, Google etc.) effort and art of now unknown/defaced artists and developers...

If you have problems with me, I ask you to discuss this in private. Otherwise, your attitude does not seem professional or accountable.

I appreciate you heartfelt... for your marvelous effort, time, and love... you've already invested into the platform. Yet, it's obvious that the platform has changed. It's sorrowful to know Hacker News became this utter mess, where also initially trusted people derail conversations and threaten members on public, and for this? Thankfully, there are other venues, including public even as Lobsters (previous Barnacles), IndieHackers, DailyDev, DevTo, Tildes, HackerOne, or fediverse-like Lemmy/PieFed instances even.