seky

aren`t there other models? or is Claude still unbeatable in content writting?

hosting comparison tool https://www.punycoder.com/hosting/

https://www.htmlwasher.com/ - online HTML cleaner

also https://www.gluee.com/ - Text Styling for Social Networks, Slack, Teams etc...

https://www.contextractor.com/ - Web content extraction tool to feed LLMs

I have a. suite of tolls for developers:

https://www.punycoder.com/ (a tool for Punycode to Text/Unicode and vice-versa conversion),

https://www.htmlwasher.com/ (a tool if you have some dirty HTML and need to clean it up),

https://www.htmlcorrector.com/ (a tool if you have some not so well-formed HTML and need to fix it),

https://www.htmlenc.com/ (a simple tool to HTML encode (escape) a text),

https://www.urlenc.com/ (a simple tool to URL encode (escape) a text),

https://www.gguid.com/ (a customizable GUID generator),

https://www.64baser.com/ (a Base64 and vice-versa encoder),

https://www.hexator.com/ (a Hex and vice-versa encoder),

https://www.cescaper.com/ (a C and C++ string escaper and unescaper) https://www.htmlinstant.com/ (a simple HTML editor).

https://www.notationer.com/ (a tool to switch across (code) notations, like camelCase, PascalCase, snake-case).

Frontend is mostly in React/Next.js (Some older projects have frontend still in the old ASP.NET MVC and Ajax :-)). Where the backend is needed, it is written in .Net/C# and running on Azure.

interesting,

tho, is it a good idea use the .it domain for technology potentially blocked in Italy?

I have a coupon site for developers https://www.gluee.com/ and a set of small tools for developers:

https://www.punycoder.com/ (a tool for Punycode to Text/Unicode and vice-versa conversion),

https://www.htmlwasher.com/ (a tool if you have some dirty HTML and need to clean it up),

https://www.htmlcorrector.com/ (a tool if you have some not so well-formed HTML and need to fix it),

https://www.htmlenc.com/ (a simple tool to HTML encode (escape) a text),

https://www.urlenc.com/ (a simple tool to URL encode (escape) a text),

https://www.gguid.com/ (a customizable GUID generator),

https://www.64baser.com/ (a Base64 and vice-versa encoder),

https://www.hexator.com/ (a Hex and vice-versa encoder),

https://www.cescaper.com/ (a C and C++ string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.csharpescaper.com/ (a C# string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.jsonescaper.com/ (a JSON string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.rustescaper.com/ (a Rust string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.pythonescaper.com/ (a Python string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.javascriptescaper.com/ (a JavaScript string escaper and unescaper),

https://www.javaescaper.com/ (a Java string escaper and unescaper) and

https://www.htmlinstant.com/ (a simple HTML editor).

All are written in .Net/C# and running on Azure, HtmlInstant has frontend in React, otherwise they are old ASP.NET MVC and Ajax :-)

thanks :-)

thanks :-) I even didn't test it on Word's HTML

ok, yes why not make it customizable

you are right - I will rewrite it to use HTML Tidy lib or something like that and it will be compliant

my project does not want to compete with any lib or commandline or other downloadable tool - yes - it's main purpose is convenience

thanks, I will consider using Bleach as an underlying lib / part of my service

thanks for your comment :-) I think rather than using a web service people would use some library like the HTML Tidy. Regarding to opensourcing - I think I will rather use some opensource as a core lib for my project.

there is link to my company where is my identity - so it is not anonymous :-) but yes - why not, will fill there something more

yes - but this is not an online service - I wanted to build something handy you can use when you are stressed at the office need to reuse some other HTML doc quickly no time to install anything :-)

I also realized this tool/lib exists after doing Html Washer - I am considering to use their lib as an underlying lib for my project

e.g. when you are migrating an old website to a new one - that was when I missed such tool in the past

Yes, that could be more specific (and I will make it probably configurable), currently it is: <a href>, <body>, <br>, <div>, <h1>, <h2>, <h3>, <h4>, <h5>, <h6>, <head>, <hr>, <html>, <i>, <img src width height>, <li>, <ol>, <p>, <ruby>, <strong>, <table>, <tbody>, <td colspan rowspan>, <th colspan rowspan>, <title>, <tr>

"Being right about something" is a basic prerequisite to being a successful demagogue

(sorry had to somehow shorten the title to fit in the form)

Explanation: new gTLDs = new generic top-level domains = new domain extensions

The article means the new gTLDs introduced in the last couple of years

Does it make sense to invest into something ad-based in the age of adblockers?

Not criticizing, I just want to launch an ad-based website project too

Maybe he doesn't like that Britain is the financial center, perhaps he thinks money spoils people :-)

Does turning it off just mean YOU wonn't me able see the recorded history? :-)

You're right, thanks for supplying the info

I meant, if you need perfect sharpness for the zoomed image, you need to supply bigger PNGs, otherwise they're blurred

Not to say, if you (easily on such devices) zoom to max zoom on a hi-res display, the resulting image is 8times zoomed in comparison to normal desktop PC image. And for same quality (sharpness), you wouldn't only need 8times larger PNG for this, but 8x8=64times larger PNG.

I have written my prev reply before I've seen yours.

Yes, if its mostly double-sized resolution then blurring shouldnt be a prob,

And when it is some strange "1.something" or "2.something" resolution, then probably also PNGs will look blurred, unles you dont supply exact special PNGs for such resolutions

I see, it is an interesting point, thanks.

For me, that would be one of the main reasons against SVG

Well, many websites uses simple graphics, simple logos... It's 2013 - yes, and nowadays simple, flat, design is modern, rather than graphics with a lot of effects, that was modern in the past, IMHO.

But I agree with your argument regarding to something is not properly - yes, that can be the reason why people don't see the whole thing as reliable