770 karma · joined April 8, 2018
Exactly, and how many of those conversations are wasted on nothing? Sure, there's a social element to it, so how about we highlight that aspect and not some "lightbulb" moment that derives from small talk.
Quote from @TwitterDev:
"Starting February 9, we will no longer support free access to the Twitter API, both v2 and v1.1. A paid basic tier will be available instead"
These lawsuits will go exactly like in the war against piracy, impossible to win. Cut one head off, ten more appear.
People used to say that about electricity too, and cars, and planes, and computers. This is just the next step in the chain.
Massive? Head count is back to like it was on 2021, for all of the major tech companies.
How much should they pay the workers though? It's already stated that they are paid well above average wage in said country.
That's because they want to make money, good luck attracting investors when your tool lists benefits of Nazi ideology or generates minor porn novels.
They need to make money somehow? Not really an issue for users who don't care about unique usernames.
Hehe, I wonder how does he think how 100% remote companies continue to work and excel.
What's new? They're not playing nice since Xi took over.
Are there any alternatives? Nope. Also, let's not talk about how SpaceX "should" sponge up the costs, because you would not ask Lockheed Martin or Raytheon Technologies to do that. Compared to regular prices of military hardware, Starlink costs nothing.
> The context of the term still heavily implies that "benevolent sexism" is a moral/social failure.
So...let's just call it sexism?
No it does not, SpaceX results speak for themselves, they have no competition. Same with Tesla, just check their vehicles sold charts.
You'd have to be naive to expect that capitalism will not bring in innovation and improvement to Space exploration / solutions. I'm all for it.