526 karma · joined March 12, 2009
http://seanahrens.org
I think this teaching bred that pride of which you speak.
Since I had been coding since a young age, building web apps in my spare time, when I was in classes with these people I started to actually realize I had this superpower they valued.
But truth was I didn't want to work with any of them. I didn't see the value in someone whose studies were about learning how to harness my value.
Yeah you're right to think doing double major w/ EECS would have been quite a tall order. Probably logistically impossible.
But to zoom out a second, in America, it's not just a "tenet", it's a legal responsibility of the CEO of a corporation to maximize shareholder value. The professor, and school, are preachers of something much larger than themselves, and so I don't want to point my finger so strongly at just this professor, and just this school.
He made this argument in front of 150+ person lecture class. I was so dumbfounded and shell-shocked at the argument that I couldn't believe what I just heard. I looked around at the undergrad business finance students around me, and it looked as if they were absorbing it in.
That was the day I knew I chose the wrong major.
I really did think about raising my hand in that class to respond to the hellish ethics he just espoused. But this professor frequently shouted down students or used ridicule to make people regret raising their hands, and I didn't have the worldview I now have to be able to tell him precisely and irrefutably why what he was teaching us was so so wrong.
The real trouble, however, is that this professor was just a preacher for the doctrine of modern day American capitalism. I just expected to hear the doctrine in a much more sugar-coated and digestible form. He literally read the doctrine to us right out of the book.
UC Berkeley allows undergrads to study at their Haas School of Business and earn a BS (bachelor of SCIENCE) in Business Administration. This is what I was studying. Luckily I had enough time left in undergrad after this lecture to switch to studying computer science at the College of Engineering--where I then felt like I was learning real skills.
If you believe in the vision, of gathering patients together to collect and learn from more real-world data points, in concert with oversight by researchers, then the current implementation is, well, just the current implementation to get us to that end goal, of a more engaged, globally-distributed means of learning from patients as they live and treat their disease.
Medical science is fundamentally the study of how inputs to a body relate to outputs of the body (in the scope of treating disease). If we can collect a continuity of these data points in the real-world, among a global populous, you have the potential to understand the disease in ways never before possible.
And that compelling reason--it is our hypothesis--comes from community, and knowing that what you do on the site can very directly help others. And PLM is a quantitative system, not a community place. It is our belief that instead of feeling like a hospital's electronic health record system, successful software would feel more like a Facebook -- where it is the real relationships, your real ability to help others, that compel you to share your knowledge and what treatments have worked for you.
And yes, while Crohn's & Colitis are our first network, you are on the right track knowing that our heads are churning on ways to make software that helps people with one or more of many other chronic conditions.
I hope that is helpful!
One reason people don't talk about it is because it's not "dinner table conversation".
Hehe. As a bear I say Grrr... =D