264 karma · joined January 20, 2014
Isn't that more a description of cyberpunk than scifi?
> Why isn't FreeBSD suitable for a personal computer / desktop?
Next time you are visiting a BSDCon have a look around. What are the Systems FreeBSD devs are working with and what are the Systems OpenBSD devs are working with? It is not my intention to be polemic, but I think you will see that many FreeBSD devs (in contrast to many OpenBSD devs) are too pragmatic to use their own OS on their desktop and just use OS X.
At least that is my theory, why OpenBSD make a nicer desktop than FreeBSD -- as long as you don't need any FreeBSD features.
https://hardenedbsd.org/article/shawn-webb/2015-07-06/announ...
So if you want ASLR you can have it. It's just not yet in a regular FreeBSD release.
"It is recommended that the root user's default shell remain unchanged since shells which are not included in the base distribution are installed to /usr/local/bin. In the event of a problem, the file system where /usr/local/bin is located may not be mounted. In this case, root would not have access to its default shell, preventing root from logging in and fixing the problem."
I guess there is nothing wrong with changing the default root shell to /bin/sh, but I don't know why anyone would like to do that.
Is this "academic-racism" an American thing or is it universally accepted in academia?
His videos: https://www.youtube.com/user/mintwart
I still prefer Firefox.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReplacementInit?action=show&redirect...