https://boa.realm667.com/?view=article&id=270:blade-of-agony...
141 karma · joined November 14, 2019
https://boa.realm667.com/?view=article&id=270:blade-of-agony...
I love this expression!
And I hate Oracle's and Red Hat's paywalls, even if I can understand their presence.
Well, not exactly. IBMi is still widely used, as an "affordable, low cost mainframe".
Yes, but that's the difference between "readable" and "usable". Many companies don't realize the technical difficulties to be able to run the VMs. They just expect that it will work, if needed.
It is common to have backups with retention of 10 years, some may have 20 years for legal reasons… but the majority of people don't understand the difference between "readable" and "usable".
Of course, it depends on the data… And there are companies backing up whole virtual machines with infinite retention, believing to be able to run them: it is hard enough to restore a vSphere 5.x machine on a brand new vSphere 8, I really don't understand this waste of space.
I just wanted to "show" that big vendors don't care about solving very practical issues: some companies still rely on backups on physical tapes, but the current versions of firmware of most libraries don't allow optimizing automatically the tapes. That's quite a problem when maybe a customer just bought 2,000 cartridges.
About the parallelism, it's quite simple: a tape needs to be read and optimized by a _tape drive_[0]. Libraries can be configured with a various number of drives, and the script manages all the available ones using the special device of the library and the `mtx` tool on Linux.
Also, you're right: it's impossible to decrease the optimization time of a single tape.[1][2][3]
Ah, while writing this, I noticed that HPE may have the appropriate tool on their autoloader.[4]
[0]: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/cas/3MD86RLJ
[1]: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/ts4500-tape-library?topic=drives...
[2]: https://www.quantum.com/globalassets/products/tape-storage-n...
[3]: https://docs.oracle.com/en/storage/tape-storage/storagetek-s...
- https://godsip.club/ is for my "findings" about myths, religion and folklore
- https://crooked.ink/ is for my short stories
- https://scaglio.bearblog.dev/ is my personal blog, where I want to start to post more often to exercise writing in English
Exactly my thought. Totally unexpected.
I started writing short stories a couple of years ago, and I created a Hugo website to host them: https://crooked.ink. The main issues with a blog are that it's hard to get an audience from scratch, and it's hard to be found with all the SEO effort you can do.
I also tried to submit a couple of stories to webzines and I got published once for free, but I really don't think I'll ever do it for a living.
What I wish more and still didn't get, though, it's a _feedback_ for my stories. So maybe the project could be intriguing for this, if it can get you closer to an audience.
About the apps, I am forced to use WeChat because some of my friends live in China and that is the only communication channel they have… but it is the worst experience I ever had. Even Viber was better. And in China it’s heavily controlled.
Among my contacts in Europe, Telegram is widely used and becoming almost “a standard”… only a very few use Signal.
Religions, finally, "officially" decided that a week had to have seven days.
[^1]: https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/days/7-days-week.html
Little self-promotion: I recently started a newsletter with little similar curiosities about culture, religion, myths, and folklore I found around – https://godsip.club
I really do like funny 404 pages, they add something unique to the browsing experience.