Firefox vs. Brave: Which is the better browser for you? – Mozilla
mozilla.org
mozilla.org
That said, the weirdest thing about Brave is that the BAT stuff could likely have been implemented as a browser extension. The changes to Chromium the Brave team must now maintain choosing to fork a browser are because Google makes changes in the code base for the good of their business, not consumers.
If you look at the individual level, with a purely rational 'Homo economicus' rational actor, ideals don't make a lot of sense.
It's so programmed in we think baby lions are cute.
Lets say he has no global reach his choice may change opinions of the people around hom. It may even change minds on here.
“Hey, this boat is sinking. Will this one bucket of water I throw out stop it from sinking? No? Guess I’ll just do nothing then. Maybe I’ll pour some more water in. That’s the way things are going you know.“
It's like buying on Amazon/Walmart while you see local stores shutting down when prices are more are less equivalent. Buy local if you want those stores sticking around.
Same dynamic in the browser market.
Having a commonly shared implementation is not a problem. Quite the opposite. It solves a lot of problems.
The Linux kernel is in every Linux distro and nobody is calling that a "hegemony". SQLite is used by phones everywhere and that's not a problem.
1. Oh great, [x] sponsored shortcuts
2. How helpful, Mozilla ticked the following boxes for me: [x] Allow Firefox to send technical and interaction data to Mozilla [x] Allow Firefox to make personalized extension recommendations [x] Allow Firefox to install and run studies
3. Wait, what is this pocket icon thing on my interface?
Right click / customize toolbar / drag it out of the way
4. Oh nice, customization menu! It allows me to change the UI density that, honestly, is too big for my 720p screen. Ouch, there's no way to make things smaller, only increase, I guess.
5. Let's continue to dig deeper into the settings: [x] Recommend extensions as you browse [x] Recommend features as you browse
It's an uphill battle against the only player worth(?) supporting.
Let's do the same with Brave:
1. Hide Widgets {FTX,crypto,binance,Brave Rewards}
2. Customize [ ] Show sponsored images
3. [ ] Automatically send daily usage ping to Brave
4. Settings [x] Hide Brave Rewards button
To be fair, Brave doesn't have telemetry enabled by default on my system, but that's about it.
I'm more and more alienated by the web and web browsers. Which is a good thing as it annoys me out of these infinite pool’s portals.
-- Mozilla
Yes. But to most people, they're both browsers. So it really doesn't matter.
I guess one man's ad aggregator is another's man-in-the-middle attack, and those added to the compensation network without their consent may mistake it for an extortion racket.
I use Brave because it's Chromium without Google's stuff, fairly fast updates, supports extensions from the official store, etc. All other stuff is disabled... I use it as a browser.
I'm glad you seem to get it though. My comment wasn't intended as a jab at Brave's featureset, but rather to point out that they ship as completely different utilities. As someone who already has utilities for what it offers, it's hard to fit Brave into my life. On top of that, it's also hard to trust that they won't introduce some radical feature that I won't like, since it's current state is one hell of a precedent for what a browser should look like. At the end of the day I err on the side of simplicity and security.
For browser updates, I could go the binaries way, but then I'd have to use a 3rd party package manager and have to live with outdated versions (the project is on Chromium 94, but the version for macOS is still on 92). I could also build it myself, but I don't want to deal with that (I guess part of the problem is me being lazy).
The perfect Chromium browser for me would be Brave as it works right now, but without their own features. Sadly that doesn't seem to exist.
For Brave on Android I wish they deviated from Chrome by adding a no-autoplay option for videos.[1]
[1] https://community.brave.com/t/where-is-the-disable-video-aut...
I've tried it, but it tries to do a lot (email client, notes, very customisable, etc) and sometimes I would get overwhelmed with all the options. It also seems to use more resources and was not as fluid as other Chromium-based browsers (at least on my machine). I've heard that they rely a lot on javascript so it's easier to maintain the UI and features across all platforms, but the performance suffers a bit.
Brave is closer to Chromium and Chrome (UI, features, etc). If you try it, keep Brave Rewards off, ignore the crypto side of things, it can be a nice Chrome replacement if you don't need all the Google stuff (sync, etc).
In any case, if you're happy with Vivaldi, then keep using it. I don't think it's a bad browser, but sadly it doesn't fit my needs.
-Mozilla ;)
I know that it used to be a PITA to take a screenshot on Windows but surely they solved that issue?
But surely the marketers know better than me, so what's going on?
[1] https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/issues/761
[2] https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters-ansible/issues/45
[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18734999
[4] https://web.archive.org/web/20181221180137if_/https://twitte...
[5] https://web.archive.org/web/20181221231556if_/https://twitte...
[6] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27549604
[7] https://slate.com/technology/2014/04/brendan-eich-why-mozill...
Brave is a browser. You can use it as a Chrome replacement without Google stuff. Optionally, you can also enable the crypto stuff if you want to see ads and be paid a few bucks for that.
Brave Rewards for sites/creators... you don't have to claim the money (I do, eg: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27598202 ). Any manual or automatic donations are refunded if you don't claim the money (after 3 months, I think). They don't keep that money.
Some will say that blocking ads and then using Brave Ads is "blackmail". Well, the adblocking part isn't anything new. Firefox, Edge, Opera, and... Brave block ads by default. Users are already blocking ads, so I see this a different way to get revenue from users that block ads, but want to support me.
Now, the crypto currency itself. I don't care about it. I receive BAT, convert it to my local currency and then use it to pay for stuff. It's the same as receiving a payment in a different currency. Of course you can go on and play with crypto on some exchange, just like you can do the same with currencies that you trust, but that's unrelated to the browser and the cryptocurrency itself.
It may change in the future, but right now, I don't see any scam here.
(I use Firefox as my main browser and Brave as backup/when there's a compatibility issue.)
That is literally how human brains are wired by default. You touched fire and burnt you hand - fire bad. Big person hit you and took your food - big person bad.
To be fair, this statement seems to be relying on mind-reading. You seem to be making a guess that Brendan's motives are to pump his token, rather than privacy.
I view Brave as a very interesting experiment that could be very much in defense of privacy.
Here's the chain of logic, as I see it.
We all realize that data is a commodity that businesses are desperate for.
This is bad because it ultimately leads to privacy being wrecked, among other issues. We can see Google and Facebook operating here as an indication of this.
One possible solution to this is to come up with a new business model for advertising that does a far better job protecting people and giving people ultimate control: which is what Brave is attempting to do. Who knows what direction Brave will take? BAT is just an ERC-20 token that can be moved by any Ethereum wallet even apart from Brave. If this succeeds, the advertising market online in the next few years may move in a positive direction.
FF is still the least bad.
This information is a bit outdated, Firefox has offered HTTPS mode built-in for a few versions now.
[1] https://nitter.mailstation.de/gorhill/search?f=tweets&q=%22e...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adblock_Plus
[3] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...
Edit: Just use 'Ublock Origin' instead.
That is not wild speculation but rather the official narrative from Adblock Plus. Their main revenue stream is the acceptable ads program [1]. In order to see if they make "millions", I am also linking their financial statements from the Company Register in Germany [2]. Please note that this document is in German and I read it using machine translation software.
[1] https://adblockplus.org/en/about#monetization
[2] https://www.unternehmensregister.de/ureg/result.html;jsessio...
However, despite these issues, I use Firefox as my daily browser for personal stuff and Brave for work (I need a Chromium-based browser).
"This product doesn't come the way I want it, so its bad"
Then change it once and thats it. I have my firefox like I want it, saved profile and now even on new machine i can have my firefox experience.
Why dont people complain that their IDE doesnt come with the font and colour scheme that they like?
And giving they don't care about they use opiniouns they should just shutdown the telemetry.
(It's funny to see a download link for Firefox at the end of this article, look like they are desperate.)
They should be. I'd be happy to see more desperation from them if it means more users, more investment (not from Google), and more chances at staying afloat.
I have hundreds of bookmarks, all neatly categorized, compared to the New Tab page's paltry 16 or whatever. I also get the exact same page in Firefox (personal), Chrome (work), or Firefox/Android.
It sounded silly at first but now I can't live without it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinboard_(website)
Desktop site: https://pinboard.in/
Mobile site: https://m.pinboard.in/
iOS/iPadOS/macOS app: https://get-pins.app/
- The bookmarks bar doesn't "fit" the current and previous two UIs. Margins/paddings are all wrong, at least on macOS. Why design a new UI if you're not going to apply it to everything?
- The bookmarks manager still opens on an old window, with small text, even though Firefox went the "Chrome way" and started using tabs, not windows for this type of content. Only recently this window started supporting dark mode.
- Bookmarks behave differently from other links. Eg: it doesn't respect the shortcut to open a link in the background.
- Bookmark icons are hard to update. While other browsers update the favicon when we visit the page, Firefox doesn't always do that. We need some hack or addon to force the browser to delete all favicons and then load each link so it gets the new favicon... why make it so hard?
- Not 100% related to bookmarks, but when opening a different bookmarks at once (eg: a folder), Firefox doesn't seem to prioritise the active tab. Chromium appears to be faster because of this.
I'm currently using Firefox, but I'll be honest: it's a mess of a browser. Old and new code, different philosophies, different UIs, all used side by side. Even more annoying is the fact that they ignore all this and use their limited resources on stuff that is mostly fine (eg: a new UI, a new search bar, etc).
FF's concept of user benefit is restriction. How many users are now enjoying a better world because they can no longer save a webpage to PDF?
Fellow frogs, you're being boiled.
The only thing I used containers for was mixing personal and work stuff in one window.
This is for sure not true, Firefox 81 was released more than a year ago