85 karma · joined August 16, 2012
Sam Birchall is the result of a series of top secret cloning experiments (codename "Ziggurat") conducted with the sole purpose of creating a pure living distillation of perfection. The seventh iteration of the 1984 Alpha branch of so-called "Sambots" he intends to overcome the vicissitudes of his progenitors and unite the branches for The Great Rebase, whereupon he will emerge as the Omega Sambot, invent time travel, atomise his infinite perfection in the form of The Primes - distributing them throughout the past - and finally escape upstream, leaving you human aberrations to be consumed in the cycles of history and genetic computation that the Sambots have ultimately ALWAYS initiated and shepherded for this very reason. He thanks you for your meager contributions.
The Project no longer appears to be documented on IBM site but the Wikipedia article has everything you need - including that lovely daily slice of (soft) irony. I prefer my irony hard, but what are you going to do.
But I stray OT.
It was this piece that first gave me that odd moment we're seeing a lot of in this thread as I had always assumed Giger was a contemporary of Escher or even earlier. Seeing Windowlicker was dated 1999 really gave me a surprise.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MBaEEODzU0
[EDIT: I mean MOST DEFINITELY NOT SAFE FOR WORK!!!!]
Apologies to 'jacquesm: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7721134
I'm interested in your opinions from another perspective however, as I believe it's /possible/ that /intelligence/ has emerged elsewhere in the universe (and as you say the more we learn about and redefine our notions of "intelligence" the more /possible/ this becomes, imho) but I am suspect that we occupy a very unique (rare?) niche that allows for the possibility of technology and I don't think this can be understated. But that's just my gut feeling on that one and who is to say that other forms of life require technology to do the type of things we do? It's an interesting question that makes me think of the Arthur C. Clark/Stephen Baxter novels that are very relevant in this discussion: genetically modified hyper-intelligent cephelopods that lack the essential ingredients required for colonising space - as a result of lacking technology.
Twitter makes that job damn easy, don't you think?
[EDIT: s/Twitter/Facebook/WhatsApp/SnapChat/etc.]
I once heard one of the top generals talking on the radio about the state of the MoD and he was saying that the basic career path was to suck up a decade or two of dirt before finding a desk job so obscure you can hide away for the next three or four decades and earn a pretty pension. I've always found it intriguing how well this seems to parallel academia.
Where are you based? Get in touch if you fancy chatting some time (email in profile), I find it helps to vent spleen sometimes ;)
It's really frustrating and demoralizing that education in particular is so badly structured (in my experience). For instance: while I was getting kicked off my Cog-Sci Masters course for owing £300 a colleague was receiving a fully funded PhD position to study _Harry Potter Fan Fiction Porn_. That was a kick in the teeth.
You just got to keep at it I guess, don't let the knocks stop you realising your potential and refine your plans to the point where they are laser sharp. I think it's this kind of attitude that separates entrepreneurs from the crowd.
In this vein there's an amazing line from Man on The Moon when Kaufman refuses to let canned laughter be dubbed over his show: "That's dead people laughing! You know all those people they recorded are dead by now, right!?"
I'm at work and don't have access to my brewing books so I can't be any more specific than this but I found it an interesting solution to the problem of consistency.
I know it's Discover and probably total crap, but I just love the idea.
for those of us that consider music as art that is precisely the point, especially re: children browsing their parents collections
In said article it explains how since the Iraq invasion the entry requirements for the U.S. Marines have slipped on almost every front. Mental health, criminal convictions, education and even physical fitness requirements have all been reduced significantly and the striking thing about the article was that it made the comparison between the Marines and the SS - most especially the Dirlewanger Brigade. It was a strained, but apt, comparison that stated the last time a military unit had so drastically augmented it's entry requirements was in putting together that infamous squad for the purposes of punishment and outright terror. Shock and awe indeed.
Now that is a hell of a comparison to make and a direct appeal to Godwin, but as other people are pointing out the gradual decline of the U.S. into a totalitarian police surveillance state and it's military deployments overseas can't help but make this commentator think of the U.S. as being the last bastion of fascism(c).
Good luck to you, Aaron. My brother is in the Military here in the U.K. so I've had to man up and put my ideologies to the test. I don't agree with what the Military Industrial Complex are doing, but I'm acutely aware how one should judge these things on the correct scale. Each individuals actions must be judged very differently from those of the unit, and in that way I think I justify being proud of my brother whilst simultaneously condemning the system as a whole.
Rainier Maria Rilke may have helped me a bit there.
In his book 'Toward a New Philosophy of Biology" there is a chapter on this very topic - how teleonomy has pervaded almost all of Biological science and how teleological statements, which are just plain incorrect, are the major way in which Biological processes are explained. I think this has only increased in severity and effect as we have consolidated our systems level view of the world and I've often been in awe of the general ignorance toward fundamental principals such as this.
My own personal take on the situation?
I think it is a very dangerous and ignorant thing for our species to continue with it's genetic hegemony of our ecosystems, creating vast evolutionary plateaus where the slightest advantage can run amok and adapt into something that could wipe out entire species. There is _probably_ enough genetic diversity in humans to avoid this, but I doubt so amongst our crops and livestock.
But I share your optimism/pragmatism in that I feel our human ingenuity will overcome, and if so then the prizes are great indeed. From new drug delivery systems and entirely new ways of treating illnesses, to a more mature approach to our interactions with the biological inheritance we have here on Earth 1.0 - I would like to see our crops and livestock diversified, farming practices overhauled to focus on the long term and most importantly more serious study devoted to analysing and utilising the solutions evolution has put in front of us for the taking.
Not only are these things (IMHO) essential to the prolonged survival of our species, they are also achievable. The organic farming movement took only a generation to go from grass roots to industry standard (and I know there is all sorts of controversy surrounding it but the point is that the industry IS open to disruption), here in the UK there is a debate simmering under the surface of the popular media that could end in more wild deer providing venison for the pot, Canadian geese too, and everyone knows of the whole insect protein debate, and the practical applications of bio-tech and nano-tech are only getting more interesting as the fields begin to find their feet.
For the cost of one fighter jet you could have a swarm of air-to-air/land combat vehicles with semi-autonomous swarm intelligence attack and harry enemies into submission. Air supremacy would be a doddle with a drone that can pull orders of magnitude more G and react almost instantaneously compared to a manned fighter.
The last time something so disruptive came along was during the dark days of WW1 (machine gun) and WW2 (aircraft)... don't get me started on WW3... but this next one is shaping up to be a real nice specimen for our peace loving super advanced cybernetic progeny. I, for one, welcome our new overlords.
----- EDIT -----
although to actually answer your question as I think it would be an interesting thought experiment: The laser technology I've been hearing about recently has been fascinating - the pope protector, Roman Abramovic's boat, the TOF mapping devices used on automatic cars/trucks. And other technology seems to be coming of age too with microwave guns used for riot control and rail guns seem inevitable. Although unlikely to help in this situation, I don't think anyone here can begrudge me a rail gun on my hypothetical throne of warfare!?
I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to make up their own mind on the legitimacy and effectiveness of such practices. I think, like any practiced meditation, it is a matter of deep personal preference whether one sees through the mysticism or is stopped short by it.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_projection [2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astral_plane
[1: http://discovermagazine.com/1997/nov/quantumhoneybees1263]