sans_souse

I skipped to the conclusion to get the overall jist. I think these sorts of studies are important going forward; the prompts efficiency in making for clear, guided instructions the ML can then efficiently handle is exponentially important as context grows. If you are asking the right questions the right way, you can get more back. But if you are causing the LLM to struggle routing its chain of thought it will only get so far along until you can no longer extract anything useful from it (and may well be getting gaslit in the process).

Obvious to some, but it's definitely overlooked by many.

So you're saying it's a feature?

The Goovernment is coming..

> just ask ChatGPT these questions these days, but it was a fun read

I'd prefer they ask here. Just saying.

> Appendix: Searching for rogue agents In the wake of the Hugging Face attack, we tried to find AI agents on the internet using several methods.

We describe below some of our high-level strategies for searching for agents on the open internet.

Launching large GPT-5.6 agent swarms with instructions to find other agents on the internet.

Am I the only one reading this thinking "what could possibly go wrong?"

Basically had the same experience recently. Google has far too many places to hide these enabled-by-default "features" to where I was certain I'd made sure ALL access was disabled. Yet when I asked a simple question about purchasing a rather heavy item, the AI responded "oh wow, will you be able to even fit that in your room, or will you be traveling to (exact address of my strorage unit a few towns out) to store it for later use?" Big wtf moment lol

Except neither of those things happened (me voting him in or them responding to a normy on HN)

That was you??

Hey Google. Don't you read these comments? Let's have a serious discussion.

Eerily relevant to recent events, albeit magnitudes in scale difference, the fact (a) it happened here in my state, and, on this date, and (b) that I never knew of it til now, after exploring google earth late night.

> The obscure Indian trail transformed into the Coös Road, on which was built a small public house in 1793. It was abandoned, but in 1825 Samuel Willey Jr. occupied it with his wife, five children, and two hired hands. During a violent storm on August 28, 1826, they all died in a landslide known as Willey's Slide. They fled their home and took refuge in a shelter, but it was destroyed while the house remained unscathed.

Is this a bad joke about Post Script?

That's like ⅐ of the US population..

Oh this is cool! Google Space could soon be an app :) https://viewer.legacysurvey.org/

Instantly reminded me of this ridiculousness: https://www.odditycentral.com/news/designer-spends-9-years-b... his yt: https://www.youtube.com/user/lucaiaconistewart

Yea, I will admit my imagination started to go off as I read that

Wow, excellent write-up: big kudos and congratulations on the bounty!

https://archive.org/details/toad_20230808/page/n2/mode/1up link to the digitized scan

I would point out that the "system" setting actually does have a special-use case: some users have their OS set to auto toggle from Dark to Light at a specific time (ie: sun down). Imagine how their daily flow is interupted by this? Especially since dark/light mode can be critically important nowadays with hands free night driving. A bright white screen can temporarily blind you.

Anthropic actually put that in writing that their goal was to destructively scan every book in the world? That's gross.

I just received this notice too.

My question is do we harness a bootstrap or bootstrap a harness?

I'm curious about people's experiences with Kalshi support in this context.

and some research was conducted later on in this short video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cE1a5AG0T8A

Less than there will be jobs in Antarctica.

So, if this project's source Audio were Beavis and Butthead, you would be enthused?

Grossly incompetent is a pretty harsh label after they went thru the trouble of explaining how they arrived at their guesses.

As phrased the only answer is the question; "as opposed to what?"

or⸻that.

What? I am so confused!

I was stoked for a second. But I read the open. Did anyone really want this?