samtheprogram

Reminds me of YouOS. RIP

Could be Intel specific -- the writer has a touch bar.

It doesn't seem much worse to me if at all. Not a noticeable difference. That said, the laptop is only a year and a half old, with the battery cycle count at 314.

I also wonder if I'll have a "oh, the battery life _is_ much worse" moment soon, but not yet!

Yet to be determined if they actually ship or do stuff at a reasonable rate. It only has any notoriety because of the subject matter and jumping on the hate-DHH train.

I guess they've been "laying the groundwork" of a fork that claims to just want to rename things and do little else for over a month?

In the current/legacy market, people accept bugs in software because software was expensive and the alternatives are often few for that same reason.

Tomorrow's software will need to be _perfect_, or else it won't differentiate from "Claude, build a basecamp-style project management tool for my team".

Probably the same reason as oh-my-zsh, you don't need 90% of it. Further compounding the problem in an agent harness is that you are polluting the context window by throwing the kitchen sink at it.

Unfortunately I don't know yet because I updated for Xcode 27 + iPhone dev, so having an iPhone plugged in 24/7 is heavily spewing the results towards "much worse".

If I can still reply mid-to-late next week I'll let you know.

Per the article, that's the price OpenAI is willing to pay for an exploit that covers any account or integration one connects to their OpenAI account. Let that sink in.

I don't think the other commenters mentioning how server-side vulnerabilities aren't as lucrative in the black market are making that connection.

Maybe macOS 26 was lot bigger... but I went straight from Sequoia to Golden Gate and freed up like 30 GBs. I didn't have enough disk space to download the update prior, so the extra 30 GB wasn't that... but could've been caches I guess. I assumed it was dropping Intel?

They already knew to drain the basin. Control-F in a PDF is way less annoying than watching a 9 minute long (for the algorithm) YT video.

Sure, you can search the video transcript... but all the YT video is doing is regurgitating the manual.

Did you not catch the emphasis? They did end up writing about it.

Sure, not for the same reason, but... got'em.

Tailwind is so pervasive it's 100% in pretraining _and_ RLHF.

I've done several Tailwind projects and rarely did models from various providers need to reference Tailwind documentation.

> go after profitable niches and avoid unwinnable fights

If you know Apple's history, this should stand out to you.

I desperately miss their old XULRunner app. No longer worked through the API as of ~3 years ago and was a sad day for me.

He didn't say 90% of the coding jobs. He said LLMs would write 90% of the code. As in be LLM generated.

If you've ever been confused about which turn is which with top down navigation, then this is for you. While driving a car, being able to at a glance know exactly what turn is what would have saved me countless wrong turns, my parents probably doubly so.

One classic: there's a fork in the road on the way to my parents. One side is "straight", the other side is an exit. I took the wrong, exit side of that several times while my app said to go straight before I just knew the route and didn't need GPS at all. Top-down isn't as good in these cases because of densely packed roads and back to back exits.

That said, it's "good enough" and I doubt this takes off.

I had to login the other day to use it. Probably getting slowly rolled out.

If you just want it to generate UI out of nothing, the benchmarks aren't really for that.

If you want to generate a UI based on specific user input of some kind, then they are.

I'd suggest using one model for UI and another model for tacking onto that UI. LLMs are great at pattern matching, and benchmarks don't really capture one-shotting desirable UI.

That said, benchmaxxing is a thing and your experience with models is a thing. Benchmarks are fuzzy and should be taken with a grain of salt.

> designed

What?

That's an insane take. Anything?!?

That's solely so that you burn more money. It's totally unnecessary to assume the parent model. Sure, it could be upgraded from Haiku if there was a solid reason to, but...

> None of my GOG games run on Linux, while most of my Steam games run on Linux.

Stop spreading misinformation. Even if you're a non-techie you can add non-Steam games to Steam's launcher (my extremely tech illiterate friend just did this) and they'll run with Proton.

It comes down to a game by game basis, and it's still extremely rare (outside of recent 2025/2026 anticheat AAA title stuff) that any game would have a Linux specific/impacting patch.

I disagree with this. If agents are doing asynchronous work, it's really an artifact anyone should be able to look at.

Check my last submission on this site -- same news story (different site). I agree with them, and it's distracting and damaging to the cause.

You're also essentially saying the same thing I did, because I'd argue most people already have a non-neutral stance on the subject.

Calling border patrol "thugs" doesn't really bolster your argument to anyone except people who already agree with you.

You wrote "port", perhaps you meant "maintain"?

Abortion? Permissive drug laws? Immigration? Homelessness policies? Vaccines? American AI gave me these examples, and they're not really so cut and dry. Do you have a better example that's being left out (no pun intended)?

Passing "{}" handles most sane cases including spaces. If I'm doing bash that needs to be robust (rare and/or dotfiles) or know the folder/dataset has weird filenames, sure.

Literally just use xargs with -I {} and quotation marks?

Let's ban weed and alcohol from recreational use too, if there was any benefit a doctor would prescribe it. /u