366 karma · joined February 15, 2024
You can read about me and get my contact details in my website: https://www.salomonmuriel.com
meet.hn/city/co-Bogota Capital District - Municipality
Socials: - linkedin.com/in/smuriel - cal.com/salomuriel
Interests: Entrepreneurship, Hacking, Maker Culture, Programming, Social Impact, Education, Python, Go, Typescript, Data Science, Web Development
---
A default of "show none" is probably sane for visibility, in particular if you have many tables or columns in the whole diagram
As a matter of fact, most dollars are indeed created without "paying something for them". Out of thin air. They are just points in a database, no more real than the Bitcoins you say need to be "mined".
A ton of that is probably encoded elsewhere, but no doubt the brain plays a huge part. And somehow, it's all reconstructed for each new "device".
The issue is that many companies that are truly after just money pretend they are not.
The mission can be capitalistic. We can say our mission is to be the best in our industry for our region. No need to say we are changing X amount of lives (because we aren't).
Then you attract talent that is keen on working in an organization striving to be the best (meaning being on the leading edge of tech in a given industry). But keeping a more altruistic mission when it's not true is just a recipe for disillusionment and higher personnel rotation.
Reinvent the way academic careers work. No need to even have the concept of tenure. No need to get a PhD degree to be recognized as someone researching something.
Anyone should be able to publish research without being on such restrictive terms. The article's main takeaway is that the institution of academia has perverse incentives that hold back innovation. I believe the way jobs and degrees are structured are part of that.
It's the cornerstone of investing. You diversify to hedge risk, not to increase total yield.
You can "easily" assign KPIs to the company as a whole or to business units (and hopefully you pick the right ones, as other commenters pointed out). But the more granular you get, the harder it is.
How do you assign KPIs to an individual person? Sales sounds easy. But what about finance roles? Software developers? The cleaning staff? Office administrators? Then you need to make it really specific for each person. Should the KPIs for a Junior Frontend Dev be different to those of a Mid or Senior? What about a Data Engineer? And MLOps Engineer? DevOps? How do you measure the exact output of a Creative Designer? And UI UX designer?
Its VERY hard to do what you suggest, and the typical result is that people mend up being measured not on what really matters but only.on what could be quantified easily for a spreadsheet.
Also, thinking of customers as "fools" only makes sense if you believe you are selling/producing garbage. If what you make has value, then whoever buys it is no fool.
Default logo sizes are larger, settings menus are basically the same no matter the device, software and hardware are coupled and designed by the same company making everything snappier. The subtle.design difference also come into play.
I use Android myself, but it is a fact that Apple is superior in UX, which is unsurprising given that they are obsessed with UX as a company in general and the whole ecosystem is designed by themselves alone, while Android is designed and developed by many players. Even a 2 year old can use iPhones and iPads.