20,541 karma · joined August 24, 2008
I think you're off.
First of all, if it's done intentionally, it's fraud. And if two people have blabbed to random Substack guy, then this would be easy to prove.
Secondly, what exactly is the strategy here? Borrow a ton of money to buy buildings, then default on them and walk away? Where's the profit exactly?
Third, the firms capable of raising this level of capital also care about their reputation and ability to borrow money in the future.
And finally, the buildings won't be worthless when the bank takes them over, they'll just be worth less. To lose trillions here, this would have to happen on a scale of $10 trillion or more? The entire commercial real estate market in the US is only worth like $20 trillion.
Then it's a completely different product...
There’s plenty to be concerned about with climate change without making unfounded breathless claims.
But that kinda ignores the impact that AI will have on the concept of the SO community, or whether they’ll even be a need for it.
I honestly think his take is a misread of what kind of “community” SO has. My use of SO has always been 99% functional and borderline mercenary. I’m not getting to know anyone, I’m not building relationships, I just need a question answered. There’s nothing sticky about this community other than it being a good place to get those questions answered. As soon as AI can do that, I’ll never return to that “community”, and I’ll miss it as much as I miss Yahoo Answers.
I don’t know if what he’s suggesting here makes sense (I tend to think no), but I’m automatically a little skeptical of the typical response to a serious threat: “no way, y’all, this is actually good for us!”
Imagine google coming out right now and saying the future of AI is search ads.
First, you apparently missed this paragraph:
Rather, Lee and Momeni were portrayed by police as being familiar with one another. In the wee hours of April 4, they were purportedly driving together through downtown San Francisco in a car registered to the suspect.
Doesn't sound to me like the reporter is just speculating based on the LinkedIn profile.
Secondly, I'm pretty sure you have the wrong filing. The LinkedIn profile says "Inc", not "LLC", so I think it's probably file #4776106, which is still active, and registered with an address in Emeryville, which is where police were headed to arrest Momeni.
Rather, Lee and Momeni were portrayed by police as being familiar with one another. In the wee hours of April 4, they were purportedly driving together through downtown San Francisco in a car registered to the suspect.
Pew reports 31% of Americans are unpartnered, and of those, half are looking and half aren’t: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/08/20/a-profi...
I wonder if you could do a series of different named robots instead of people?
1. https://electrek.co/2023/03/09/2023-tesla-prices-how-much-do...