20,541 karma · joined August 24, 2008
Answer: it's complicated.
https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/republicans/2019...
We could probably come up with a lot of things that have improved since the 80s and 90s too. That doesn't mean things are dramatically improving.
I hope you find some peace.
Reminds of the Chinese proverb: “Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing it.”
Think of the savings of slashing that finance department staff :)
I only scanned a few posts, but it appears to be an old anonymous blog with disjointed musings about why the author finds mindfulness "annoying". I didn't see anything to convince me that this is worth digging into further, like for example: a really cogent argument, or some research, or any kind of background in anything remotely related, etc. So I'm still unclear on what made you conclude from this random blog that Kabat-Zinn is just peddling pseudoscience.
It honestly sounds like you're just anti-mindfulness, which isn't inherently a bad thing. I don't think we should have sacred cows, and there may be valid anti-mindfulness arguments from serious people out there. But drawing conclusions based on this particular blog makes it seem like you're not interested in figuring out what's true (ie, science) as much as finding justification to support your pre-existing position, regardless of the evidence (ie, pseudoscience).
Sounds like your own standard of evidence isn't much higher than pseudoscience.
And the argument that anything beyond plain text is a waste and ruins everything applies to literally every single medium out there where the written word is conveyed: webpages, magazines, printed flyers, books, etc. It's laughable to think that all formatting of any kind beyond ASCII is a waste.
If it were up to HN readers, the entire world would be so ugly and boring.