873 karma · joined March 24, 2010
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/26/guo-wengui-chinese-bill...
The market got us here. Why the fuck would you expect it to get us out of this mess?
Furthermore, no formal analysis was done of the Treehouse experience.
Nothing conclusive can be inferred from the Treehouse experience until/unless they release data and a rigid analysis is done.
The quote in question: "Practically all start-ups internally are disasters"
Not just "often", but "practically all" start-ups. It's true in my experience, and not necessarily a bad thing. Of course, it would be great if everyone acted thoughtfully, didn't let ego get in the way, planned things just enough (but not too much), etc., but that's not just not the way it happens.
Acknowledging this fact, getting okay with it and still forging a highly functional team in the midst of such chaos and tragedy is the key. That's a tall order.
It also underscores my loathing for cutesy, irreverent naming conventions.
I saw the headline, read the article, got excited, landed on the homepage, looked for San Francisco on the list of programs... then left the site, disappointed. You won't get a lot of opportunities to capture customers like the one you just got (and lost) with me.
Use mailchimp or something similar and you can fill this deficiency in a few minutes.
I just sent this same message to support (at) mixpanel.com.
EDIT: just to reiterate -- the major problem isn't the API being down. It's the extreme timeouts being experienced trying to load a static JS file.
The plethora of middle men at all stages of the current state of the industry (talent discovery, production, distribution) are really destroying the art.
Kudos to Louis for using his success as a platform for change. I hope others in the industry will discover their courage and follow suit.
No. The judge has yet to decide this (much more important) issue.
More info here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3940322
Mush more nuanced analysis here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3940322
To anyone wondering, "How could this possibly be true? How could so many companies be getting the hiring process so wrong?" I say: it's because they aren't focused on the goal. That doens't mean companies never achieve their goals, they are simply optimizing the wrong aspects of the process.
For anyone interested, the book The Goal by Eli Goldratt (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Goal_(novel)) illustrates this phenomenon very well.
As laypersons, we may feel more comfortable when companies avoid legalese and use straight talk, but that doesn't mean we are any more safer or protected.
- More storage space, lower price
- Ecosystem for 3rd-party apps
- Integration with existing Google services and two-factor authentication
I like Dropbox and would love to keep using them, but they will need to respond strongly and quickly if they want to keep my business.
There's very popular idiom in Rails development of updating model data from a form POST/PUT in one line of code in a controller:
my_object.update_attributes(params[:object])
Because many users follow this approach, it made this hack widely exploitable. You can either assign parameters piecemeal in the controller or explicitly set the attr_accessible attributes in the model. There's nothing inherent in Rails that caused this vulnerability, rather it was programming practices by developers.