roopeshv

see the video for the answer

if we were to follow the trend in software engineering/computer programming/technology companies, we want more doctors who drop out from medical school to be surgeons.

first law: poe's law... Then I concluded, "nope, religious nut"

it's called hallucination.

perfect example of messed up priorities.

Fake Portfolio of person who sent that stuff: http://www.chroma9.com/

Comment from Friend of the person who requested for work: http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/w57og/a_web_designers_r...

Full email: http://i.imgur.com/UsrMh.jpg

isn't there a similar article on the net where people said facebook should get out of this social networking space because it's effectively competing with myspace and orkut?

How many times will people rehash the same arguments?

what was that about being judged? and generalizations?

I think a more apt title would be "Why I don't need online presence"

with gist: I'm a woman and will be targeted for it. and my job doesn't require me to, and is better avoided

i don't understand the anatomically implausible part

i don't think it's yoga pants

lot of people can call you honey. some even use it just to reference other people. like darling is used UK (most annoyingly, gordan ramsay)

you are going to get lot of criticism for the title, and first page. just a heads up.

who is this fucktard that wrote this? it's higgs boson particle. not higgs particle.

> "I believe it is a deliberate omission," says P M Bhargava, founder director of the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology

biology center's director? seriously to comment on physics. I agree he might be a scientist, but this is retarted.

flag (everyone flag it too)

an article about false dichotomies.

I don't know why you switched off the javascript. If you want to test how it looks where js can't run check this: http://imgur.com/wJIGO. It's w3m browser, and both work fine without javascript.

then you'll be accused of objectification.

the only reason i use CS is because I can get away with typing way less than needed. There is a one time cost (huge? or not!) for setting up tooling to compile it automatically.

If not anything, typing is the only reason I love CS. Because studies have shown (anyone got links, i know them from greg wilson's talk from CUSEC)

1) Less lines of code - less mistakes

2) You produce same number of lines of code, no matter the language

and (not related to studies) 3) less lines to debug 4) if you can deal with the idiosyncrasies of JS, that person can deal with CS quite well. (stawman argument anyone?)

you can suck my dick then

please provide citations and don't expect people to clean up after you. and still it's a hearsay, no link to memo (although internal)

"that's the great thing about internet, you can make up quotes, and attribute it to others" --abraham lincoln

so, please cite.

he's an asshole, so he's a potential rapist. he doesn't respect his daughter and wife, so a potential rapist. he is bothering me, so a potential rapist. i don't want him to make me uncomfortable, so let's make him publicly and nationally uncomfortable. great logic. i wish this world was filled with more awesome people like you.

> "They were coming at it from this big science, super practical, scalable angle. They were saying, 'We want to get into the multi-billion-dollar meat industry with a plant-based meat.'

show us the science. (anyone who fucking links me to documentaries, and non-cited articles/studies, i'll fucking punch them in the face)

from the downvotes all I understand is you have no clue of any more.

and more?

tldr: run for enjoyment, not for running sake.

i am not addressing most parts of the answer, but this one part of the reply bugs me the most; "he wound up raping another member". Because this equates any sexual harassement with rape. Are you suggesting that someone would eventually rape just because they are assholes?

did you listen to the talk

in all fairness, that sentence is said more like a passing comment and not a discussion topic

No matter how it is modified to fit the context, that is not how it's taken http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_tolerance

because science focuses on repeatability and control. personal successes do not. Any thing that passes as science has been proven to a degree of certainity, by definition. Any science is good science because it's been proven, and then there is science that got famous.

from the CoC is fuck a sexual language?