My first thought was that the author was being overly sarcastic in an effort to make fun of willful ignorance. Now I think he is more like the religious version of the "NASA faked the moon landing" people. What few facts he offers are completely wrong or greatly misunderstood. The entire article can be summed up in one sentence: Science is to hard for him to understand so God must exist.
first law: poe's law...
Then I concluded, "nope, religious nut"
Right. So someone called it "the goddamn particle", media bowdlerized it to "the God particle", and suddenly its probable existence proves God? Hmmm...I have a very nice bridge for sale, while we're in this territory.